* Tomas Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-10 09:25]:
> If I was to hack some code (and tests) up which supported my
> originally suggested syntax ( Chained('sub1', 'sub2') for
> joining chains), what would anyone feel about it?

You could no longer make `uri_for` work in the general case if
you did that.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to