On 10 May 2008, at 15:26, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Tomas Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-10 09:25]:If I was to hack some code (and tests) up which supported my originally suggested syntax ( Chained('sub1', 'sub2') for joining chains), what would anyone feel about it?You could no longer make `uri_for` work in the general case if you did that.
Aha! I had a feeling the reason that someone didn't do that already is that there was a compelling reason to not do so - I just hadn't thought about it hard enough..
I'll shut up and go away now, thanks guys :) t0m _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
