On Friday 10 October 2008 01:21:14 pm Jason Kuri wrote: > Great work. I was looking into this yesterday. I'm glad you beat me > to it. :-) > > To follow up on Tomas' comment - Why not make the override_base_uri / > override_base_uri_secure include the schema? So if you want the URI's > to include https:// even if the request is coming in not-secure, you > can do that. > > Without this functionality it would be hard to do SSL accelerators and > such properly. >
I was trying to be clever and make it so that you only needed one config key in the case where your secure and nonsecure bases only differed in the scheme. I guess it was too clever. I'll go back and make them entirely separate -- it'll be less code anyway. :) Andrew _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
