Dan Dascalescu wrote: > >> I never heard of this site before, but since it's mentioned >> here I assume it's somewhat "trusted". > > I have no idea who's behind AppliedStacks - I discovered it > accidentally while doing the research for the Paradox of choice essay. > I contacted their support e-mail with a bunch of bugs but no reply so > far (it's been 4 days) > .... > Most of the sites added have been crawled by bots from pages > listing "Web sites powered by..." >
Hi everyone, The applied stacks wiki is actually a hobby site of mine. As Dan Dascalescu mentioned, most of the sites listed there include a citation so you can find out what the original source material was for whatever tool set claim is being made. Other sites have been submitted as "Self reports". Here, someone is claiming that they were involved in building a site and thus are a credible source regarding what was used to build it. In any case, I do my best to monitor new submissions and changes to existing entries. Besides deleting obvious spam, I try to keep an eye out for any questionable claims. So, hopefully, things should be relatively accurate overall. -Dan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-The-paradox-of-choice-in-web-development-tp22005769p22067963.html Sent from the Catalyst Web Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
