On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Rodland <[email protected]> wrote:
> The 5.7 - 5.8 transition should require little to no rewriting of > application-level code, so I'd suggest sticking with the released 5.7 for > serious production. If you're inclined, though, and you have the resources, > you could set up a box with 5.8000_06 in parallel for testing -- that would > let you know about any hassles you might have upgrading in the future, as > well as letting you contribute bug reports on 5.8 to avoid said hassles. :) Rather than a separate box of VM you could also set up a separate local::lib directory tree. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
