From: "John Napiorkowski" <[email protected]>
... the revolutionary Moose Object system, the most
advanced Object
Oriented framework for any major scripting language
I would change that to 'one of the most advanced' - less
flame
igniting (and by the way Perl 6 probably does have a more
advanced
Object system).
I really want to agree but then I read some of the crazy hype coming out
of pretty much every other system and I ask myself if our modesty hurts >
us? I mean I'd rather go to the mat and try to argue Moose is the best
thing ever and stir some controversy than to keep being ignored as we
have been.
Any other thoughts or feelings? My first version of this was even more
strongly worked, but I toned it down a bit. Still, I figured at least one
person would call me out on one or two bits. I'll mellow it out if people
think I should.
You can say that Moose is the best, but in that case I think it would be
elegant (and helpful) to also say why.
If we don't even know if it (and why) it is the best... I think you should
not tell that.
Octavian
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
