I prefer just 'programming language' -- Kiffin Gish <kiffin.g...@planet.nl>
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 07:43 -0400, kevin montuori wrote: > >>>>> "ZL" == Zbigniew Lukasiak <zzb...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> ... the revolutionary Moose Object system, the most advanced > >> Object Oriented framework for any major scripting language > > ZL> I would change that to 'one of the most advanced' - less flame > ZL> igniting (and by the way Perl 6 probably does have a more > ZL> advanced Object system). > > Why not something like "... the most productive ..." -- Moose is great > but not exactly advancing the state of the art; indeed, it's > implementing a technique/protocol that's been around a long time now. > > Also, why does Perl have to be a "scripting language"? I don't write > scripts (particularly with Moose), I write programs. If you're > uncomfortable with "any major language" (or, better, "any popular > language") how about substituting "interpreted" for "scripting"? > > Just a thought. It's nice to see someone publicizing Catalyst! > > > k. > > > _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/