On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Simon Wilcox <sim...@digitalcraftsmen.net>wrote:
> On 28/4/09 11:13, J. Shirley wrote: > > Addendum: Don't drive away prolific responders by responding to single >> lines uttered as an aside, because you have your own gripes. >> > > You mean me, obviously. In response all I'll say is that I picked you up > when you had repeatedly complained about top posting. It wasn't in response > to a single line but your repeated complaint and in particular you > automatically complaining about top posting when the OP hadn't done any such > thing in the case to which I responded. > > But I'm sorry if I caused you any offence, I realise that I was in danger > of trolling which wasn't my intention at all. That's why I didn't continue > the discussion. > > You are more helpful on the list that I am, as you know more about Catalyst > that I do, so I don't really have a good position from which to criticise. > > I did consider sending this as a private email but I'll send it back to the > list to acknowledge that meta-complaints just don't help. I'll endeavour not > to repeat the mistake ! > > Rgds, > > Simon. > > > Your point about it being automated is fairly accurate. When I notice it, I simply start my thread off with a single line pointing it out. It is very little more than that, and I often do not put any additional thought into the matter. He (Akimoto) just basically got the response from 'autopilot' because he relentlessly posts in random and weird formats, making his messages difficult to parse and difficult to respond to. You didn't cause me offense. You caused irritation, and there is a subtle difference. Offense is when you take things personally that you shouldn't. Irritation is when you go, "Why do I bother?" That's why I'm taking the time to post now, publicly, about how irritating it can be when you devote time and energy into something and people only come in to attack something on the sideline. It's not just mailing lists, it happens frequently in open source contributions. Some people who are more heavily vested don't get phased by it, but others do. Ultimately it is very damaging to any community, and at the core it is all just bike shedding. People lack the confidence to respond to the original point, so they attach to a minor inconsequential detail. This behavior has basically stopped me from contributing to anything beyond the mailing list and blog posts, because I don't have the patience to deal with the bikeshedding and handling signal to noise. Fortunately, in most cases, mailing list posts are seldom afflicted with bikeshedding and when they are I simply mute that thread and move on. Keeps me happy, at least. The message here isn't about me, though. I'm much more meta about it. It is about the people who know the answers, but lack the confidence, and instead contribute to bikeshedding. It's damaging to any aspect of any volunteer based community. Please consider how your words and actions can impact the group. Every time a bikeshedder runs off a contributor, God kills MSTs braincells. Please save MSTs braincells. So, look at that... I still ended up writing my rant. Damnit. Just remember, ask yourself, "Is this good for the company?" -J
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/