On 31 May 2009, at 20:19, Kiffin Gish wrote:
Just wondering what kind of experience folks in the catalyst community
have had using lighttpd/mod_perlite as replacements for the more
widely
accepted apache/mod_perl stack. While apache might be better in being
proven technology and mod_perl being better documented, I'm still
looking for lightweight and scalable options.
Not one of I had heard of up until now, and a quick google make it look
a little bleeding edge for my taste.
However, I, and many others, are using lighttpd with fastcgi with great
success - there are a number of articles on this including a few advent
calendar ones.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [email protected] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
