On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Kiffin Gish wrote:
> Just wondering what kind of experience folks in the catalyst community
> have had using lighttpd/mod_perlite as replacements for the more widely
> accepted apache/mod_perl stack. While apache might be better in being
> proven technology and mod_perl being better documented, I'm still
> looking for lightweight and scalable options.
Shadowcat's clients tend to end up on $webserver + FastCGI or $proxy + Prefork
depending on their requirements.
mod_perl is more 'legacy' than 'accepted' to people using practices from
this century.
--
Matt S Trout Catalyst and DBIx::Class consultancy with a clue
Technical Director and a commit bit: http://shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Limited
mst (@) shadowcat.co.uk http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
