t0m,

Thanks. I'm trying the link method and it is good to know it should work.

There is a lot of Auto-Magical behavior in Catalyst and the helper scripts; or so it seems. By arbitrarily changing the name of the top level directory, may I have broken any of it? Particularly, the make scripts I will need when I go to actually deploy the app?

This system crash, in the big scheme of things, may be a good thing. As it is forcing me to take a crash refresher course on how I got from an initial Catalyst install to the application I have now. Very helpful; when I go to deploy.

Tom


--On Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:17:57 PM +0000 Tomas Doran <[email protected]> wrote:


On 16 Dec 2009, at 20:57, Tom Stall wrote:
Or, barring that, is it possible to update the scripts, (using the
catalyst.pl helper script), when they still have the "MyApp" name
prefix, in a top level directory of a different name?

I might try a link: ln -s OfficialSoundingProductionApp MyApp
to make things work, but the in-elegance of that possible solution
makes me gasp.

That will work.

Or just catalyst.pl MyApp; cp MyApp/script/*
OfficialSoundingProductionApp/script/*

either is good.

That aside, renaming your production application's top level directory
doesn't actually rename the classes, so they're still all called MyApp :)

The purest in me would like to have a way to rename all the internal class references. But the practical developer in me can, I suppose, live with this.


Cheers
t0m


_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/





_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to