Denny wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 19:05 +0100, Matija Grabnar wrote:
Anyway, I noticed that Ubuntu server seems to lag seriously behind the
Catalyst packages I see on Debian unstable
Well yes. Debian unstable isn't generally considered suitable for
production servers - there's a clue in the name.
I realize that. However, if we think that the latest Catalyst is stable
enough, now is the time to act. A month from now will be definitely too
late.
Is there a reason you'd rather not install Catalyst from CPAN?
Two reasons:
The more important one is that whatever is in Lucid when it is released,
will be there as default install for several years more - that is what
LTS means. Advising everybody "oh, if you've got Ubuntu LTS, just scrape
Catalyst off and install from CPAN" is a bad idea.
The less important reason is that is vastly easier to install Catalyst
from aptitude than it is directly from CPAN. Particularly if I want it
to update when critical fixes (or other upgrades) come through.
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
