On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 19:33 +0100, Matija Grabnar wrote: > Denny wrote: > > Well yes. Debian unstable isn't generally considered suitable for > > production servers - there's a clue in the name. > > I realize that. However, if we think that the latest Catalyst is stable > enough, now is the time to act. A month from now will be definitely too > late.
Oh I see... I thought your concern was for your own deployment, not for improving Ubuntu. Yes, it would be nice if the imminent LTS release of Ubuntu had something reasonably recent and solid in it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
