Like I said, when I used extjs 3 years ago. If they did so then, why would I invest significant money in using them now? Maybe next week they would decide on another change of licensing arrangement. -Peter
On Jul 26, 2010 6:57 PM, "Jason Kohles" <[email protected]> wrote: Unless you are referring to the old licensing scheme (which went away some time ago) then discouraging ExtJS use because of it's license is absurd, as the license is GPL. They do have a commercial license available as an option, but you only need that if you want to distribute ExtJS as part of your application and are not prepared to do it under the terms of the GPL. On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Ashley Pond V wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Jones...
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
