On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jason Kohles <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unless you are referring to the old licensing scheme (which went away some > time ago) then discouraging ExtJS use because of it's license is absurd, as > the license is GPL. They do have a commercial license available as an > option, but you only need that if you want to distribute ExtJS as part of > your application and are not prepared to do it under the terms of the GPL.
Not wanting to distribute under the GPL is not uncommon and while one might argue it's not the Right Way(tm), I don't think there is a good argument for it being "absurd." _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
