On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Ian Docherty <catal...@iandocherty.com>wrote:
> It's 'normal' not to create Catalyst specific models, but to create > your model outside of Catalyst (so you can use it in things like cron > jobs for example) in which case you just use a thin adaptor class. See > Catalyst::Model::Adaptor > > If you do it that way you don't need to publish a cpan module at all. > > - icydee > > Was that for me or Gianni? I wasn't aware of Catalyst::Model::Adaptor, seems like a useful module. What is the general take on modules such as Catalyst::Model::WebService::Solr if it's 'normal' to use C::M::Adaptor? Isn't that pretty much the same as I was suggesting for RabbitMQ? Is it thought of as depricated? /Jon
_______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
