The story of the century - Obama's birth certificate
<http://www.voicescarryblog.com/the-story-of-the-century-obamas-birth-certificate>http://www.voicescarryblog.com/the-story-of-the-century-obamas-birth-certificate T minus three days and counting… On December 5, the United States Supreme Court will consider the question of the growing concerns about Obama's birth certificate. I've dubbed this <http://www.voicescarryblog.com/total-media-blackout-on-the-december-surprise-obamas-ineligibility-for-office/>the December Surprise. Lawsuits in sixteen states are challenging his eligibility and even if he is sworn in, lawsuits will be filed challenging every move he makes as president. The mainstream media is finally starting to report on <http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/12/01/obama-birth-certificate-rears-its-ugly-head-again/>the story of the century. Yesterday a full page ad appeared in his hometown paper, the Chicago Tribune, asking Obama to <http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/ChicagoTribune-ObamaLtr-Nov-2008.pdf>produce his original birth certificate. (pdf alert on that link - but the ad succinctly sets forth the main concerns.) Forensic experts have concluded the document on his website is <http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82503>a forgery. Obama has spent $500,000 SINCE the election to keep the original concealed. Why? Hospitals in Hawaii are now saying he wasn't born there. From the AOL news link above… In the end, there is no practical reason why Obama refuses to produce his original birth certificate. He is seeking the Office of President and has a duty to provide evidence that he meets the explicit requirements established by the Constitution. For those who think all this doesn't matter I'd point you to this… a Constitutional attorney spells out the ramifications of all in this an article in the Philadelphia Bulletin called <http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20210273&brd=2737&pag=461&dept_id=576361>Obama Fomenting A Constitutional Crisis. "Let's assume he wasn't born in the U.S.," Mr. Vieira told The Bulletin. "What's the consequence? He will not be eligible. That means he cannot be elected validly. The people and the Electoral College cannot overcome this and the House of Representatives can't make him president. So what's the next step? He takes the oath of office, and assuming he's aware he's not a citizen, then it's a perjured oath." Any appointments made by an ineligible president would have to be recalled, and their decisions would be invalidated. "He may have nominated people to different positions; he may have nominated people to the judicial branch, who may have been confirmed, they may have gone out on xecutive duty and done various things," said Mr. Vieira. "The people that he's put into the judicial branch may have decided cases, and all of that needs to be unzipped." Mr. Vieira said Obama supporters should be the ones concerned about the case, because Mr. Obama's platform would be discredited it he were forced to step down from the presidency later due to his ineligibility, were it to be discovered. "Let's say we go a year into this process, and it all turns out to be a flim-flam," said Mr. Vieira. "What's the nation's reaction to that? What's going to be the reaction in the next U.S. election? God knows. It has almost revolutionary consequences, if you think about it." Mr. Vieira said Mr. Obama's continued silence and avoidance in the release of his birth certificate is an ethical issue because of the dire consequences that could be caused by a possible constitutional crisis. "If he were my client and this question came up in civil litigation, if there was some reason that his birth status was relevant and the other side wanted him to produce the thing and he said 'no,' I would tell him, 'you have about 15 minutes to produce it or sign the papers necessary to produce the document, or I'm resigning as your attorney," said Mr. Vieira. "I don't think any ethical attorney would go ahead on the basis that his client could produce an objective document in civil litigation [and refused to do so]." Further, Mr. Vieira cited a fraud ruling in a 1977 case called U.S. v. Prudden, which he feels applies in this case. "Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading," the ruling reads. "We cannot condone this shocking conduct … If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately." My favorite part of that was this sentence… any appointments made by an ineligible president would have to be recalled, and their decisions would be invalidated. That would be good news for the unborn. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Catholics on Fire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
