November 13, 2008




EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service 
Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama's Draft Registration 
Raises Serious Questions

<http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
 


By <http://www.debbieschlussel.com>Debbie 
<http://www.debbieschlussel.com>Schlussel

*** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES ***

Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in 
September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, 
instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, 
which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service 
registration commit the crime for him?

It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack 
Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A 
friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year 
trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act 
request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and 
released it to me.

But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying 
document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it 
shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's 
claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was 
required by law.
obamaselectiveserviceregist.jpg
Obamaselectiveserviceprinto.jpg
]

The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama's 
Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show 
that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature 
on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have 
committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of 
limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it's proof positive 
that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective 
Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and 
was legally able to do so until the age of 26.

But the Selective Service System registration ("SSS Form 1") and 
accompanying computer print-out ("SSS Print-out), below, released by 
the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, 
all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:

* Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was 
Created in 2008

First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In 
the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, 
there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case "0897080632," 
which I've labeled as "A" on both the SSS Form and the computer 
printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on 
the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make 
it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008.

As the retired federal agent notes:
Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know 
that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN 
representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was 
issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact 
same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is 
from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year 
Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, 
why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN 
in the database (which was manually input) reflect a "corrected" DLN 
year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked 
with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different 
DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS 
Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It's quite a "coincidence" . . . that is, if you believe in 
coincidences, especially in this case.

Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service 
registration to cover Obama's lack of having done so, and that the 
person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to 
"80" instead of the current "08". They either forgot to fake the DLN 
number or couldn't do so.

And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and 
recorded? Lucky for Obama, it's his native Chicago. From an article 
entitled, "Post Office Registration Process", on the Selective Service website:
When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post 
offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he 
completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective 
Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the 
man's registration.

Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent 
to the Selective Service System's Data Management System (DMC) near 
Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable 
quantities. Each card is then microfilmed and stamped with a 
sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is 
reviewed to account for all documents and to ensure that the film 
quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are 
keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.

The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective 
Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 
7-8 of 
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/837498/US-White-House-Federal-Register-getdoc>this 
Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the 
year, and it was not changed to "08" in error. So if the form was 
filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 DLN?!

* Obama's Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form 
Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form

On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number 
(SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as 
"B". On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as "FEB" 
(February), and the year is either "80" or "90". The retired federal 
agent investigated further:
Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with 
different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of 
either a "80" or a "90".

But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see 
<http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#>http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#),
 
it's apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency 
<http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/DownloadNOA?requestID=177647>withdrew 
a "Request for a new OMB control number" for SSS Form 1 (see also, 
<http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001>here)--meaning
 
the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was 
never issued in "FEB 1980".

Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 
94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of 
Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not 
approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it's nearly 
impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama's SSS Form 1 to be dated 
"Feb 1980." And since that makes it almost certainly dated "Feb 
1990," then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp 
it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.

The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was 
approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as "C". 
The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.

* Barack Obama's Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature

Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1's "Today's date" as July 30, 
1980, labeled "D". But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day's 
date of July 29, 1980, labeled "E". Yes, Obama could have mistakenly 
written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for 
someone to put a future date than a past date. (Also note how Barry 
made such a "cute" peace sign with the "b" inside the "O" of his 
signature. Touching.)

* Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970

Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. 
The "postmark" stamp--labeled "E"--is hard to read, but it is clear 
that at the bottom is "USPO" which stands typically for United States 
Post Office. However, current "postmark" validator, registry, or 
round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows 
"USPS" for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office 
to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon 
signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the 
founding of the Republic--Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service 
officially began operations on July 1, 1971.

Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten 
(10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that 
just happened to be Barack Obama's suspicious Selective Service 
registration form?

* Form Shows Barack Obama didn't have ID

The SSS Form 1 states "NO ID", labeled "F". Since that's the case, 
then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was 
really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from 
attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine 
whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, 
friend, or other imposter?

* The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a 
Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.

The retired federal agent who FOIA'd Barack Obama's Selective Service 
Registration Form notes:
Early this year, when I first started questioning whether Obama 
registered I was told:
Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his 
registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm with 
our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the 
Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.

Sincerely,

Janice L. Hughes/SSS

Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to 
my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on 
September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the 
computer database?

On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on 
September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could 
not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending 
Occidental College in California, the classes of which commenced 
August 24, 1980.

* Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response 
Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page

Where is Obama's Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the card?

And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data 
Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request prior to 
the request having been made:
The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled "G"], but the date 
of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled "H"]. My FOIA was dated 
October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my 
FOIA? I gave them no "heads up" that I was sending it. In fact it was 
not mailed until late October--around the 25th.

Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled "I"].

Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what's on it?

A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this 
government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service 
registration was faked. Either he signed the fake backdated document, 
or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the 
draft (and lied about it).

Which is it?

It's incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn't 
register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.

The documents indicate it's one or the other.

*** UPDATE: Here's another irregularity that points to fraud, as 
spotted by reader Joyce:
My husband printed the information provided on your web site 
regarding Barack Obama's Selective Service registration 
discrepancies. I noticed that the DLN number in upper right corner 
(labeled "A") has only ten (10) digits with the first two being 08 , 
but the DLN number shown on the computer screen printout has eleven 
(11) digits with the first two being 80. It clearly indicates that 
the "8" was added at the beginning of the DLN number, in order to 
appear that it was issued in 1980 and wasn't simply a reversal of the 
first two digits as the retired federal agent noted. This in itself 
appears questionable. I would think there is a standard number of 
digits in all DLN numbers.

**** UPDATE #2, 11/14/08: Retired Federal Agent Source Reveals Himself:
The recently retired federal agent has requested that I disclose his 
identity so that there is no question as to the source of the information.

His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired last year from the position 
of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement's (ICE) Galveston, Texas office. He has over 32 years of 
government service and has held a Secret or higher security clearance 
for the majority of those years.

He filed the FOIA with Selective Service and has the original letter 
and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his 
findings and they ignored the questions.

He can be reached via email at 
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected].

UPDATE #3, 11/17/08: Some Obamapologists are claiming this is a fake 
and want to see evidence that retired agent Coffman actually got 
these documents from the Selective Service System Data Management 
Center. Below are scans of the letter and envelope that accompanied 
Barack Obama's fraudulent registration for the draft (I've cropped 
the blank white space):
coffmansssltr.jpg
coffmansssenv.jpg
]

Posted by Debbie at November 13, 2008 01:56 AM

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to