Pluripotent stem cells without embryos, cloning, or viruses

<http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2009/03/pluripotent_ste.php>http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2009/03/pluripotent_ste.php
 

By <http://www.MaryMeetsDolly.com/blog>rebecca on March 4, 2009 10:23 
AM | 
<http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2009/03/pluripotent_ste.php#comments>No
 
Comments
ShareThis

The "holy grail" of regenerative medicine would be stem cells that 
are pluripotent (able to become most or all of the 200 cell types in 
the body) that are also a genetic match to a patient. This would mean 
that a patient could be treated with cells that are flexible enough 
to become whatever cell type is needed but also would not require 
that the patient take drugs to prevent rejection like with other transplants.

As of now, there are two ways that scientist are looking to achieve 
this. Therapeutic cloning is the first. Therapeutic cloning would 
create a cloned embryo that would be a "genetic match" to the patient 
and then that cloned embryo would be destroyed for the embryonic stem 
cells inside. Unfortunately, this approach has all kinds of problems. 
First and foremost, it would create and destroy human life which is 
never justified even if the outcome is a proposed good. Secondly, 
this approach would require a multitude of human eggs which would put 
young women at risk of exploitation. Egg donation is an involved 
process that in some cases can cause infertility and, in rare cases, 
death. Thirdly, the cloned embryo would not truly be a genetic match 
to the patient because there would be DNA leftover from the woman who 
donated the egg. Finally, this approach opens the door to 
reproductive cloning, or cloning to produce children, which nearly 
everyone finds repugnant.

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) are considered the 
alternative to cloning for embryonic-like stem cells. In this 
approach, scientist take a cell from the patient and "reprogram" it 
back to an embryonic-like state. These cells would be a genetic match 
to the patient and they appear to behave just like their embryonic 
brothers. No eggs, no embryos, no cloning, no creation or destruction 
of human life. Genetically matched pluripotent stem cells without all 
of the ethical issues.

In the past, this approach had one real problem. To "reprogram" the 
cell, researchers had to insert four genes into the DNA of the cell 
with viruses. Some of these viruses have been known to cause cancer 
and inserting and leaving genes in the genetic material of a cell 
that would be used for therapeutic reasons is never a good idea.

This week researchers have announced that they have overcome this 
problem. They used a system that inserts the four genes needed to 
reprogram the cell and then removes them. From the 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/01/AR2009030101741.html>Washington
 
Post:

In the new work, Nagy and his colleagues in Toronto and at the 
University of Edinburgh in Scotland instead used a sequence of DNA 
known as a transposon, which can insert itself into the genetic 
machinery of a cell. In this case, the researchers used a transposon 
called "piggyBac" to carry four genes that can transform mouse and 
human embryonic skin cells into iPS cells. After the conversion took 
place, the researchers removed the added DNA from the transformed 
cells using a specific enzyme.

"PiggyBac carries the four genes into the cells and reprograms the 
cells into stem cells. After they have reprogrammed the cells, they 
are no longer required, and in fact they are dangerous," Nagy said. 
"After they do their job they can be removed seamlessly, with no 
trace left behind. The ability for seamless removal opens up a huge 
possibility."


Scientists used embryonic skin cells for this study, but are 
confident that it will work in adult cells as well. This breakthrough 
naturally begs the question: Can we stop destroying human embryos for 
their biological material now?

Some scientists say that research into both iPS and embryonic stem 
cells is needed to see which will be better for treatment. But I say, 
why create and/or destroy human life when there are promising 
alternatives that do not? Why take more of the limited taxpayer 
dollars and divert them from iPS research to research on embryos, 
cloned or otherwise, when the ethics is such a huge issue?:

"Stem cell research that requires destroying embryos is going the way 
of the Model T," Richard M. Doerflinger of the U.S. Conference of 
Catholic Bishops said. "No administration that values science and 
medical progress over politics will want to divert funds now toward 
that increasingly obsolete and needlessly divisive approach."


I truly believe that the research into iPS cells would not be 
advancing at such an accelerated rate if there was not such a huge 
outcry all over the world against using human embryos for research. 
This moral outrage was called all kinds of ugly names. Those of us 
who expressed it were labeled religious fanatics with no compassion 
for the sick. I believe, in the end, it will be this unpopular moral 
argument against using human embryos for research that will be 
tipping point toward a better and more ethically sound treatment.

  <*}}}>< <http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on 
AllPosters today <*}}}><<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic on Amazon <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +


  <*}}}>< <http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on 
AllPosters today <*}}}><<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic on Amazon <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to