On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I admittedly didn't do much testing without MozCC installed v. with it
> installed, but rather between the old and new version.  So I'll take a
> look as well and see if its something I might have missed.

FWIW, I've been using mozcc religiously (given the conflict, I
disabled operator, not mozcc ;) so my first comparison was between old
and new mozcc.

Luis

> Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> An updated version of MozCC is now available for testing.  Version 2.3.9
> >> is a recommended update as it resolves a number of outstanding issues
> >> including:
> >>
> >> * Rewrite of the RDFa extraction engine which no longer pollutes
> >> Javascript prototypes
> >> * Performance enhancements when extracting RDFa from documents
> >> * Interoperability fixes with other extensions
> >
> > For what it is worth, Nathan, this fixes the interoperability problems
> > I had with Operator[1] but the new plugin seems to completely degrade
> > ffox performance on most of the pages I used- took several times
> > longer to load my blog and mail.google.com. This happens with or
> > without Operator installed, so it isn't the result of an interaction
> > with Operator.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing this? I don't have time (class shortly) to
> > uninstall/disable *all* of my plugins, but I'm guessing if Nathan
> > didn't see it it must be an interaction with some other plugin, so
> > I'll have to back everything out later tonight if no one else is
> > seeing it.
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4106/
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
>
>
> --
> Nathan R. Yergler
> Senior Software Engineer
> Creative Commons
>
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
>
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

Reply via email to