Luis Villa wrote: > On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I admittedly didn't do much testing without MozCC installed v. with it >> installed, but rather between the old and new version. So I'll take a >> look as well and see if its something I might have missed. > > FWIW, I've been using mozcc religiously (given the conflict, I > disabled operator, not mozcc ;) so my first comparison was between old > and new mozcc. >
So I've taken another look at this and haven't been able to track down anything firm. Experimenting with MozCC 2.3.9 v. No-MozCC, there *may* be a subtle difference in load speed for mail.google.com, but not enough that I think I'd notice if I weren't looking for it. No noticeable difference looking @ tieguy.org/blog (which I believe is one of the sites you said displayed the behavior). Anyone know of a way to instrument Firefox to get firmer numbers on things like this? Its a little difficult to track down what's going on with the extension on gmail, since there's so much content generated with Javascript. But in an effort to streamline things I did a build of MozCC with no console logging at all. You can find it at http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/software/mozcc/download/mozcc-2.3.9.1.xpi. Let me know if it does a better job in terms of performance. Thanks, Nathan > Luis > >> Luis Villa wrote: >> > On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> An updated version of MozCC is now available for testing. Version >> 2.3.9 >> >> is a recommended update as it resolves a number of outstanding issues >> >> including: >> >> >> >> * Rewrite of the RDFa extraction engine which no longer pollutes >> >> Javascript prototypes >> >> * Performance enhancements when extracting RDFa from documents >> >> * Interoperability fixes with other extensions >> > >> > For what it is worth, Nathan, this fixes the interoperability problems >> > I had with Operator[1] but the new plugin seems to completely degrade >> > ffox performance on most of the pages I used- took several times >> > longer to load my blog and mail.google.com. This happens with or >> > without Operator installed, so it isn't the result of an interaction >> > with Operator. >> > >> > Is anyone else seeing this? I don't have time (class shortly) to >> > uninstall/disable *all* of my plugins, but I'm guessing if Nathan >> > didn't see it it must be an interaction with some other plugin, so >> > I'll have to back everything out later tonight if no one else is >> > seeing it. >> > >> > Luis >> > >> > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4106/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cc-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel >> >> >> -- >> Nathan R. Yergler >> Senior Software Engineer >> Creative Commons >> >> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler >> -- Nathan R. Yergler Senior Software Engineer Creative Commons http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
