Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now. The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another. In the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa. I've opened up a new bug ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010
If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have no validation issues what so ever. Would there be a good reason not to do this? _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
