Alright; normal deeds pass the w3c validation tool now without warnings or anything. Deeds for public domain tools will have a single attribute error, which I will remove shortly.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Yergler <[email protected]> wrote: > No good reason that I can imagine, probably just legacy (ie, leftover > from before there was an XHTML+RDFa doctype). Don't open a bug, just > fix it :). > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Palecek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now. >> >> The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to >> the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another. In >> the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa. I've opened up a new bug >> ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010 >> >> If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have >> no validation issues what so ever. Would there be a good reason not >> to do this? >> _______________________________________________ >> cc-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
