On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 22:32, Joel Rosdahl <j...@rosdahl.net> wrote: > I see. distcc 2.18.3 (the oldest release I can find on distcc.org) seems > to know about .mi/.mii. Do you think it's acceptable to upgrade to a > newer distcc to fix this? It would be nice to avoid having a workaround > for older distcc versions.
The bug is actually more subtle: distcc has global variables indicating whether whether it has seen an -x option and the last value of its argument, and forgets to clear them between running multiple jobs on the server, so it assumes an incorrect language override when no -x option is present. This bug is in the Apple-patched distcc version that's shipped with the 10.5 Developer Tools (source at http://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/distcc/distcc-1201.tar.gz), so it's -- sadly -- not a really old version. With ccache eating the -x option, I don't see an easy workaround for this bug, and upgrading distcc would mean having to upgrade it on all machines at once for compatibility reasons :-( Bernhard. _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
