Sometimes locally generated traffic doesn't properly hit outbound ACLs/policies. Did you verify that you saw matches (counters increasing) on the EIGRP traffic class?
Also, how were you matching the traffic, match prot eigrp, or with an ACL. If using an ACL, make sure that you are matching both the destination of either 224.0.0.10 or the neighbor's address. The CCIE lab is full of situations where you can be asked to do a normal thing, but then told to not do it a certain way. On a side note, the "ip bandwidth-percent eigrp" is a very interesting command, because it is a percentage command that will allow you to specify a number greater than 100, which could be used if the bandwidth on the interface was set to a lower value than what the circuit actually was. Just curious, is there a reason why you chose policing over shaping? Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Progress or excuses, which one are you making? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hidalgo Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Hello people from the list. On the "Focus Labs", Section 9 (EIGRP), question 9.18 it is requested to set the EIGRP bandwidth of a FR link to 37.5%. This WITHOUT using an interface based command (that would be the ip bandwidth eigrp AS# %). The PG gives a funky solution of actually changing the BW of the interface itself. I frankly disagree with that answer although it may accomplish the goal from some perspective. The solution that I thought of was MQC. I created an ACL to match eigrp traffic. Then a policy map to "police cir 579000" (579K). This because the BW of the interface is 1544Ks (default) and this represents the 37.5% of the total BW of the FR interface. Then, I applied the policy map OUTBOUND on the interface in question. Since I am not breaking any rules or requirements, does this look like a valid solution?? THX
