Hi Tony, This is the beginning of CCIE. Soon you will come to know that it is more of a language exam than a challenging technical exam. I mean learning technical things using non-technical language.
When I read the question for the first time in cisco press book that says do not use dynamic PVC's, my first reaction was to not use an SVC( Switched virtual circuit). Later on I come to know that it was about disabling inverse-arp. Something like this "Make sure that router R5 uses different ID to avoid loop in the network" for a BGP router means you need to use route-reflector cluster. Well, welcome to the technical world of CCIE. Thanks Suresh On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Marvin Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes locally generated traffic doesn't properly hit outbound > ACLs/policies. Did you verify that you saw matches (counters increasing) on > the EIGRP traffic class? > > Also, how were you matching the traffic, match prot eigrp, or with an ACL. > If using an ACL, make sure that you are matching both the destination of > either 224.0.0.10 or the neighbor's address. > > The CCIE lab is full of situations where you can be asked to do a normal > thing, but then told to not do it a certain way. > > On a side note, the "ip bandwidth-percent eigrp" is a very interesting > command, because it is a percentage command that will allow you to specify a > number greater than 100, which could be used if the bandwidth on the > interface was set to a lower value than what the circuit actually was. > > Just curious, is there a reason why you chose policing over shaping? > > Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Progress or excuses, which one are you making? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hidalgo > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 4:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP > > Hello people from the list. > > On the "Focus Labs", Section 9 (EIGRP), question 9.18 it is requested to set > the EIGRP bandwidth of a FR link to 37.5%. This WITHOUT using an interface > based command (that would be the ip bandwidth eigrp AS# %). > > The PG gives a funky solution of actually changing the BW of the interface > itself. I frankly disagree with that answer although it may accomplish the > goal from some perspective. > > The solution that I thought of was MQC. I created an ACL to match eigrp > traffic. Then a policy map to "police cir 579000" (579K). This because the > BW of the interface is 1544Ks (default) and this represents the 37.5% of the > total BW of the FR interface. Then, I applied the policy map OUTBOUND on the > interface in question. > > Since I am not breaking any rules or requirements, does this look like a > valid solution?? > > THX > > > > > >
