What types of errors are you actually seeing? Michael
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:09 PM, michael haynes <[email protected]> wrote: > If you hard set the port and the client to 100 full do you continue to get > errors? (i.e. is it a symptom of auto-negotiation or does it happen > regardless of negotiation being on or off) > Michael > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:04 PM, William Affeldt > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> It negotiates correctly and gets errors. I have tested with 4 different >> pc's and I get the same result. The switch negotiates 100 full and slowly >> counts errors. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> >> To: William Affeldt; [email protected] <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] < >> [email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thu May 14 11:52:41 2009 >> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Switch and pc auto neg. >> >> Hey Bill, >> >> Are you talking about auto speed, auto duplex, or both? There is a pretty >> good explanation of this in the first few chapters of the R/S exam cert >> guide v3 I believe. Don't quote me on it, but I think that with duplex, >> if >> you have auto on the switch and hard set it on the PC side the switch has >> to >> fall back to the default which is half duplex. Check out that book >> though, >> there is a good explanation. Hope that helps a little >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino >> CCIE #24347 (R&S) >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Affeldt >> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:44 PM >> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected] >> ' >> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Switch and pc auto neg. >> >> Does anyone know the exact reason why if a switchport is set to auto and >> a >> pc is hard set to anything it negotiates but gets errors? >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Jared Scrivener <[email protected]> >> To: William Affeldt; [email protected] <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed May 13 21:26:04 2009 >> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Section 1 lab 18.6 >> >> They are synonyms in a sense. CAR is a policing method, but one of many. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP Sr. Technical >> Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Fax: +1.810.454.0130 >> Mailto: [email protected] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Affeldt >> Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 10:31 PM >> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' >> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Section 1 lab 18.6 >> >> Can some one explain when to use policing and when to use CAR. The >> question >> said policing and the proctor guide used CAR. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: [email protected] >> <[email protected]> >> To: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; >> [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed May 13 18:17:25 2009 >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MRM Volume 3 Lab 7 Section 5.3 >> >> Robert, >> >> R4 does not need to join. Can you post your config? >> If I get packet loss, I usually join the group manually and test using >> pings, debugging along the way. >> >> Bryan Bartik >> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >> >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I can't seem to get a successful test, and I don't know how to >> troubleshoot why. Getting 100% packet loss. >> The MRM configuration is pretty straight forward. Does R4 need to >> join the group 230.230.230.230 for this to have a successful test? I do a >> mtrace from R2 for 230.230.230.230 and there's nothing there. >> >> I watched the video solution, I have everything in place as >> instructed, but no love. >> >> Please help. >> Cheers! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Robert Wyzykowski >> Manager, Global Telecommunications >> IMERYS >> 30 Mansell Court East - Suite 220 >> Roswell, GA, USA >> Phone: +1 770 645 3734 >> Mobile: +1 404-434 9000 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Dale Shaw >> <[email protected]<dale.shaw%[email protected]> >> <mailto:dale.shaw%[email protected] <dale.shaw%[email protected]>> > >> To: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Date: 05/13/2009 07:00 PM >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] test >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Joe Astorino >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello? : ) >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Joe Astorino >> > CCIE #24347 (R&S),CCDP,CCNP,CCDA,CCNA >> > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> < >> http://www.ipexpert.com/> >> >> Ha! Great result :-) >> >> cheers, >> Dale >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.323 / Virus Database: 270.12.27/2112 - Release Date: 05/14/09 >> 06:28:00 >> > >
