Changing this is bad right?

 

I was working on Lab 3 in V2 of the BLS and I know they show doing task 8.1
with a queue-list but I wanted to try it differently.

 

I did it in MQC:

 

class-map match-all TELNET

 match protocol telnet

class-map match-all HTTP

 match protocol http

class-map match-all FTP

 match protocol ftp

class-map match-all iIPV6

 match protocol ipv6

!

!         

policy-map Bandwidth

 class HTTP

  bandwidth percent 20

 class FTP

  bandwidth percent 20

 class IPV6

  bandwidth percent 25

 class TELNET

  bandwidth percent 15

 

 

Now, this works if you stick to the idea of 'available bandwidth' vs
'linespeed'. If it said set so-and-so to '20% of line speed' I would use a
queue-list I guess and not mess with max-reserver-bandwidth. But it says
'bandwidth' so if I use mqc with this config on a 128k circuit I don't end
up with enough available bandwidth to do it unless I mess with m-r-b.
What's the difference if I do? Queue-list don't care so they don't reserver
m-r-b for class default but MQC does.

 

Also there is a lingering question I have: is a queue-list bidirectional? A
service-policy would need to be applied inbound and outbound no? (It's too
late in the game for me to be asking these dumb questions)

 

 

So finally, this is what I ended up with:

 

class-map match-all TELNET

 match protocol telnet

class-map match-all HTTP

 match protocol http

class-map match-all FTP

 match protocol ftp

class-map match-all iIPV6

 match protocol ipv6

!

!         

policy-map Bandwidth

 class HTTP

  bandwidth percent 20

 class FTP

  bandwidth percent 20

 class IPV6

  bandwidth percent 25

 class TELNET

  bandwidth percent 15

 

interface Multilink1

 ip address 110.99.96.5 255.255.255.252

 ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 100 15

 ip pim sparse-mode

 ip summary-address eigrp 100 4.0.0.0 254.0.0.0 5 leak-map 4and5

 ppp multilink

 ppp multilink links minimum 2 mandatory

 ppp multilink group 1

 max-reserved-bandwidth 100

 service-policy output Bandwidth

end

 

Thanks guys

 

-Mike

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to