Hey Michael,
I hate to not answer your question but we just had a long discussion
similar to this... Check the archives as of yesterday! If reading
those dont answer most of your questions, please send any remaining
questions you might have.
But, there is something that you asked that wasn't brought up
yesterday so I will try my best to help with that!!
The queue-list...
If you think about that for a moment, what is a queue... Something
that is waiting to be transmitted, correct? You cant queue what
somebody is sending you... You can police it, you can send them FECN
and other methods are available but you cant queue it.
So to make a long story short...
No, a queue-list in NOT bi-directional and only applies to "output".
HTHs a little!
Here's a link...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Its the 3rd and 5th discussion down!
On Aug 13, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Michael Lipsey wrote:
Changing this is bad right?
I was working on Lab 3 in V2 of the BLS and I know they show doing
task 8.1 with a queue-list but I wanted to try it differently.
I did it in MQC:
class-map match-all TELNET
match protocol telnet
class-map match-all HTTP
match protocol http
class-map match-all FTP
match protocol ftp
class-map match-all iIPV6
match protocol ipv6
!
!
policy-map Bandwidth
class HTTP
bandwidth percent 20
class FTP
bandwidth percent 20
class IPV6
bandwidth percent 25
class TELNET
bandwidth percent 15
Now, this works if you stick to the idea of ‘available bandwidth’ vs
‘linespeed’. If it said set so-and-so to ‘20% of line speed’ I would
use a queue-list I guess and not mess with max-reserver-bandwidth.
But it says ‘bandwidth’ so if I use mqc with this config on a 128k
circuit I don’t end up with enough available bandwidth to do it
unless I mess with m-r-b. What’s the difference if I do? Queue-list
don’t care so they don’t reserver m-r-b for class default but MQC
does.
Also there is a lingering question I have: is a queue-list
bidirectional? A service-policy would need to be applied inbound and
outbound no? (It’s too late in the game for me to be asking these
dumb questions)
So finally, this is what I ended up with:
class-map match-all TELNET
match protocol telnet
class-map match-all HTTP
match protocol http
class-map match-all FTP
match protocol ftp
class-map match-all iIPV6
match protocol ipv6
!
!
policy-map Bandwidth
class HTTP
bandwidth percent 20
class FTP
bandwidth percent 20
class IPV6
bandwidth percent 25
class TELNET
bandwidth percent 15
interface Multilink1
ip address 110.99.96.5 255.255.255.252
ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 100 15
ip pim sparse-mode
ip summary-address eigrp 100 4.0.0.0 254.0.0.0 5 leak-map 4and5
ppp multilink
ppp multilink links minimum 2 mandatory
ppp multilink group 1
max-reserved-bandwidth 100
service-policy output Bandwidth
end
Thanks guys
-Mike
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
