Can you see what happens if you do: ip rip summary-address 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.192 ???
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kim Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Its not learning that address from that interface so split horizon is > not an issue. As you can see it advertises just fine, just the wrong > thing :) > > Sincerely, > Kim Pedersen > > Adrian Brayton wrote: > > I guess my next question is have you disabled split horizon on that > > interface? > > > > If you don't, it wont advertise the summary address! > > > > -Adrian > > > > > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote: > > > >> Hi Adrian (and Joe), > >> > >> To correct my summary, i actually had (though it wont have any > >> effect), " ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128" which > >> is within the scope. > >> > >> Yes.. its version 2: > >> Automatic network summarization is in effect > >> Mar 1 01:26:40.955: RIP: build update entries > >> *Mar 1 01:26:40.959: 192.168.0.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0 > >> > >> As you can see it still sends out with /24 > >> > >> A bit weird.. also in the documentation i posted, they actually do > >> run V1 (send version 1 and receive 1 and 2) > >> > >> Adrian Brayton wrote: > >>> Hey Kim, > >>> > >>> Have you set RIP to use version 2 and no auto-summary? > >>> > >>> If you dont have that set, RIP will never see a subnet other than at > >>> class full boundaries? > >>> > >>> Let us know! > >>> > >>> -Adrian > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> So i was playing around with RIP (As i usually do when im bored :) ), > >>>> and i came across an issue where my results dont agree with the Cisco > >>>> documentation. What im talking about is the manual summary ("ip > >>>> summary-address rip <network> <mask>"). > >>>> > >>>> According to: > >>>> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/iproute/command/reference/1rdrip.html#wp1025730 > >>>> > >>>> The use of a manual summary address, should override the auto-summary > >>>> functionality. This does not match up to what im able to lab up: > >>>> > >>>> R1 <-> R2 <-> R3. > >>>> > >>>> On R2, i have the 192.168.0.64/28 configured. between R2 and R3 is > >>>> 172.16.0.0, so its a different major net. Rip should with autosummary > >>>> summarize the 192.168.0.64 subnet to 255.255.255.0... This works > >>>> perfectly. > >>>> > >>>> When i then try on the interface between R2 and R3, and do a "ip > >>>> summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.128" it should > >>>> override the > >>>> autosummary, and send this network as a /25 instead of a /24. > >>>> > >>>> Anyone able to elaborate on this? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> Sincerely, > >>>> Kim Pedersen > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> // Freedom Matters > >>>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> // Freedom Matters > >> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com > >> > > > > -- > > // Freedom Matters > // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > -- Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
