Hi Joe,

  Sorry, with the "ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.192", 
still nothing:
  *Mar  1 00:19:34.741: RIP: build update entries
*Mar  1 00:19:34.741:   192.168.0.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0

  Again, if i disable auto-summary:
*Mar  1 00:20:25.320: RIP: build update entries
*Mar  1 00:20:25.320:   192.168.0.64/26 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0

Kim

Joe Astorino wrote:
> Can you see what happens if you do:  ip rip summary-address 
> 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.192 ???
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Kim Pedersen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>      Its not learning that address from that interface so split horizon is
>     not an issue. As you can see it advertises just fine, just the wrong
>     thing :)
>
>     Sincerely,
>     Kim Pedersen
>
>     Adrian Brayton wrote:
>     > I guess my next question is have you disabled split horizon on that
>     > interface?
>     >
>     > If you don't, it wont advertise the summary address!
>     >
>     > -Adrian
>     >
>     >
>     > On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
>     >
>     >> Hi Adrian (and Joe),
>     >>
>     >> To correct my summary, i actually had (though it wont have any
>     >> effect),  " ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128"
>     which
>     >> is within the scope.
>     >>
>     >> Yes.. its version 2:
>     >> Automatic network summarization is in effect
>     >> Mar  1 01:26:40.955: RIP: build update entries
>     >> *Mar  1 01:26:40.959:   192.168.0.0/24 <http://192.168.0.0/24>
>     via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>     >>
>     >> As you can see it still sends out with /24
>     >>
>     >> A bit weird.. also in the documentation i posted, they actually do
>     >> run V1 (send version 1 and receive 1 and 2)
>     >>
>     >> Adrian Brayton wrote:
>     >>> Hey Kim,
>     >>>
>     >>> Have you set RIP to use version 2 and no auto-summary?
>     >>>
>     >>> If you dont have that set, RIP will never see a subnet other
>     than at
>     >>> class full boundaries?
>     >>>
>     >>> Let us know!
>     >>>
>     >>> -Adrian
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>> Hi All,
>     >>>>
>     >>>> So i was playing around with RIP (As i usually do when im
>     bored :) ),
>     >>>> and i came across an issue where my results dont agree with
>     the Cisco
>     >>>> documentation. What im talking about is the manual summary ("ip
>     >>>> summary-address rip <network> <mask>").
>     >>>>
>     >>>> According to:
>     >>>>
>     
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/iproute/command/reference/1rdrip.html#wp1025730
>     >>>>
>     >>>> The use of a manual summary address, should override the
>     auto-summary
>     >>>> functionality. This does not match up to what im able to lab up:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> R1 <-> R2 <-> R3.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On R2, i have the 192.168.0.64/28 <http://192.168.0.64/28>
>     configured. between R2 and R3 is
>     >>>> 172.16.0.0, so its a different major net. Rip should with
>     autosummary
>     >>>> summarize the 192.168.0.64 subnet to 255.255.255.0... This works
>     >>>> perfectly.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> When i then try on the interface between R2 and R3, and do a "ip
>     >>>> summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.128" it should
>     >>>> override the
>     >>>> autosummary, and send this network as a /25 instead of a /24.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Anyone able to elaborate on this?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Thanks!
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Sincerely,
>     >>>> Kim Pedersen
>     >>>>
>     >>>> --
>     >>>>
>     >>>> // Freedom Matters
>     >>>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
>     training,
>     >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>     >>>
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >>
>     >> // Freedom Matters
>     >> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>     >>
>     >
>
>     --
>
>     // Freedom Matters
>     // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>     please visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto:  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

-- 

// Freedom Matters
// Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to