This is an interesting idea, but why not use tags instead? :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 22:41, Matt Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'll just add something here...
>
> In real life practice, I agree 100% with using E1 for the reasons already
> mentioned.
>
> However, when I am doing "lab & CCIE" type stuff - and I
> am redistributing OSPF I like to use E2.  The reason I do this is because I
> can use a metric that suits me.
>
> For example, routes from R1 I will seed with a metric of "1111" Routes from
> R2 as "2222, R3 as "3333" etc
>
> Therefore when I am troubleshooting I can quickly see where a route has
> come from just by looking at the metric, rather than trying to remember the
> IP address.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> CCIE #22386
> CCSI #31207
>
> 2009/12/9 Tyson Scott <[email protected]>
>
>>  Bauke,
>>
>>
>>
>> Remember the solution is a guide to doing things that often you can use to
>> make sure your solution works if you have problems.  if the network is
>> functioning for you then that is all that matters.
>>
>>
>>
>> Using match internal will prevent E1 and E2 from being redistributed.
>>
>> Setting E1 is a good practice as E1 will continue to be cumulative thru
>> the domain, whereas E2 is not cumulative.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>
>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Mailto: [email protected]
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>>
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
>> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security &
>> Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the
>> United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online
>> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
>> www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Bauke Dzavhale
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:29 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 2- Vol 2- DSG - Task 6-6 ; LAB 3- Vol 2-
>> DSG- Task 3-6
>>
>>
>>
>> Team,
>>
>>
>>
>> Can someone clarify the follow on Task 6-6, Vol2 DSG - LAB 2, page 72.
>>
>>
>>
>> R2#
>> Router RIP
>> Redistribute ospf 12 metric 1 match internal route-map O2R.
>>
>> What is the meaning of the keyword *match internal* when redistributing
>> into RIP and where in the LAB  is that specifically required to use these
>> keywords ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Also in Task 3-6, Vol2 DSG - LAB 3, page 92.
>> Where in the LAB are we specifically asked to set OSPF metric-type to E1
>> as configured under R8, R6, R2 and R4 when injecting EIGRP  and RIP  into
>> OSPF ?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bauke
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Looking for the perfect gift?* Give the gift of 
>> Flickr!*<http://www.flickr.com/gift/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to