That's awesome! Hit the labs HARD until then. When you come for OWLE it should be your final push before the lab. I will most definitely look forward to meeting in the March class. As we say now that you passed the written the "real" fun begins : ) Regards,
Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: marc abel <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:38:24 To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; CCIE OSL<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Eigrp Metric Question Thanks Joe, you had a big hand in my success, I pushed back my one week lab experience until the class in march. Hopefully I will be prepared to sit the lab quickly after that. On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice Work!! > Regards, > > Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > Cell: +1.586.212.6107 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: marc abel <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:45:06 > To: Joe Astorino<[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]>; CCIE > OSL<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Eigrp Metric Question > > I meant thank you to Eric and Joe #1, but thank you Joe #2 as well :) > > I surely wouldn't have passed my written today if you guys had not > helped me clear up this topic. > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: >> You're welcome (from Joe #1 and Joe #2) :P >> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:16 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Ah that makes much more sense now. Thank you both. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Just to clarify, since Bandwidth in the equation is actually defined as >>> > (10,000,000 / BW_min ) the higher the bandwidth the lower the number, >>> > which >>> > makes perfect sense : ) >>> > ------Original Message------ >>> > From: marc abel >>> > Sender: [email protected] >>> > To: CCIE OSL >>> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Eigrp Metric Question >>> > Sent: Jan 4, 2010 9:35 PM >>> > >>> > If EIGRP by default uses the formula 256*(bandwidth+Delay) to >>> > determine it metric and a lower metric is better, then a lower >>> > bandwidth link is considered superior? I've never thought about it >>> > before, but this seems totally backwards. I understand why a smaller >>> > delay is desirable. >>> > >>> > Can anyone shed any light on this, or do I have it all wrong? >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S >>> > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. >>> > Cell: +1.586.212.6107 >>> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 >>> > Mailto: [email protected] >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) >> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert >> Mailto: [email protected] >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 >> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat >> eFax: +1.810.454.0130 >> >> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, >> Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service >> Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United >> States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at >> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
