I'm still finding my way between reading between the lines, i.e. what they actually mean, implied meanings, and getting used to the question portfolio. So overall after doing a lab it's hard for me to asses at times if i completed it like they expect me to. But the more labs i do, the more confident in that ability i become it seems.
Sounds like good advice, i'll take it. Thanks Jason On May 12, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Jason Maynard wrote: > Word of advice - Do not over think the requirements as you will waste too > much time adding extra configuration which may also impact the results. You > do not want to impact your ability to complete the lab by wasting time on > "extra" configuration. > > I know that you are just working through things but you may want to consider > whether the solution you provided meets the requirement, if so move on ;) > > 4 cents - (due to inflation) :P > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alef > Sent: May-11-11 11:28 AM > To: Steve Di Bias; Max Pierson > Cc: [email protected] IE > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] frame point-to-point dlci mappings > > Thanks Steve, Thanks Max! > Yeah i know it's probably not required, but like you i rather take no risks > and deliver as much as possible. i like full reachability ;-) > > so you can't 'bounce off' dlci's more then 1 hop (as you would when > connecting via a hub) to get all the way from say r1 to r8 ? I thought if i > map it to the hub and the hub is connected to that specific router it would > work but i guess it doesn't. Like you said, am gonna need a routing > protocol for that! > > Thanks again!, > Alef > On May 11, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Max Pierson wrote: > >> Hi Alef, >> >> If they're point-to-point on a sub-interface, just use the "frame-relay > interface-dlci xxx" command. If you're restricted from using frame map > commands, is FR Inverse-arp out of the picture :) ?? As Steve pointed out, > pinging your own interfaces would definitely be a proctor question, but for > good measure, I always make my interfaces to where they can be ping'd from > their own box and all others. (call me paranoid). And also, I believe some > of the Vol 1 labs were not intended for full reachability at the end. At > least thats what some of my findings and what others have mentioned on the > list before. >> >> - >> m >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Alef <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am working on lab 6, vol1 and i wanted to achieve full connectivity, but > i am not sure how to do it on the point to point links between r2 and r4 and > r6 and r9. for the rest all is done ,lab is complete and everything is > working. What i mean is i want access to all nodes from r4, and from r9 over > those links. >> >> as i can't use frame-relay maps on these point to point interfaces i'm not > sure how to do it. how would one set such a thing up? >> >> Alef >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
