Hi would like to gage opinion on the following hardware as I can get this for a good price from someone local to me, does not include all the hardware I believe, what is ipexpert workbooks hardware/software based on?
The RACK Item Description Qty Cisco 1841 Advanced Integrated Services Router 256D/64F Security Feature Set 1 Cisco 2610XM 2610XM Multi-Protocol Multi-Function Router 128D/48F Memory 12.4 IOS CME / SDM / Easy VPN Server / Firewall Feature Set / Security Enhancements / IPV6 2 Cisco 2610XM 2610XM Multi-Protocol Multi-Function Router 64D/32F Memory 12.4 IOS CME / SDM / Easy VPN Server / Firewall Feature Set / Security Enhancements / IPV6 4 Cisco Advanced WAN Switch 3662 with MB-FE and Power Supply Frame/MPLS Switching 1 Cisco 2511 16 Port Terminal Server for Remote Console Access 1 WS-C3550-24-EMI SMI with EMI Image - Layer 3 MLS 2 WS-C2950-24 Enhanced 24 Port Ethernet Switch 4 NM-4T 4 Port Serial Network Module - WAN Switch Serial Ports 3 WIC-1T 1 Port Serial WAN Interface Card - 2Mbps 10 WIC-T1-DSU T-1 Serial WAN Interface Card - 1.5Mbps 6 Cisco 2610 Basic IP Router 1 Ethernet / 2 WIC Slot / 1 Network Module Slot 6 Study Guide / Labs CD Based Labs, CBTs, Tests, and Study Guides for the CCNA / CCNP / CCIE 1 Tech Tools 4 CD Set Simulators, Network Traffic Generators, Diagnostics, Security Wizards 1 Cable - Console Console Connector 1 Cable - Cat5 Category 5 Ethernet Patch Cables Includes CrossOvers 20 Cable - Serial Xover DCE / DTE Serial Crossover Cables - WAN Emulation 10 Cable - T1Crossover T-1 Serial Crossover Cables - WAN Emulation 3 Network Rack 7 Foot Network Rack with Racking Accessories 1 Cable - AsyncOctal 8 Port RJ45 Console/Async Octal Cable 2 Cable - Power Power Cables 22 BR Tony CCNP CCNA R&S Sent from my iPhone on 3 On 22 Apr 2012, at 20:18, [email protected] wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 (Jay McMickle) > 2. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 (Tony Singh) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:58:22 -0700 (PDT) > From: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>, Tony Singh <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I googled it and found the link.? It's from last Oct., but it was Marko. > http://blog.ipexpert.com/2011/10/11/will-there-be-a-blueprint-change/ > ? > > > Regards, > Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE > > ? > > > ________________________________ > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: Tony Singh <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 12:47 PM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 > > I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy > is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give > "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime soon, >> reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training materials >> and do not want to buy old gear. >> >> BR >> >> Tony >> CCNP CCNA R&S >> >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> >> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>> ? [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> ? http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> ? [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> ? [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> ? 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>> ? 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>> ? 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>> ? 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>> ? 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>> ? 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>> ? 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,? ? ccie >>> ? onlyone <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain;? ? charset=us-ascii >>> >>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>> >>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>> brevity. :: >>> >>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >>>> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>> >>>> BUT >>>> >>>> This guy stays on the distro.? I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >>>> help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>> >>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>> from IPX. >>>> >>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>> Sent from iJay >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> ccietocome >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>> per a specific router.. >>> >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>> >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>> >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>> >>> Am I missing something here? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>> Message-ID: >>> ? <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>> >>> Hello,? >>> >>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im >>> 21 and on a budget. >>> >>> Thanks.? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 4 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: >>> ? <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> Hi fellas, >>> >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>> as a matter of fact it is still active.? Below are my configuration >>> >>> R2 ------ > hub >>> >>> >>> R2#sr | s bgp >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> R1 ----------> spoke >>> >>> R1#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R1# >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> R5 -------->? Spoke >>> >>> >>> R5#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R5# >>> >>> here is my output from R2: >>> >>> >>> >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never >>> Active? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ---------------> it is >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 5 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>> ? [email protected], [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: >>> ? >>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>> >>> Hi Khaled, >>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>> respective loopbacks? >>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> Sender: [email protected] >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> >>> Hi fellas, >>> >>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>> as a matter of fact it is still active.? Below are my configuration >>> >>> R2 ------ > hub >>> >>> >>> R2#sr | s bgp >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> R1 ----------> spoke >>> >>> R1#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R1# >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> R5 -------->? Spoke >>> >>> >>> R5#sr | s bg >>> router bgp 1 >>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> ! >>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>> no auto-summary >>> no synchronization >>> exit-address-family >>> R5# >>> >>> here is my output from R2: >>> >>> >>> >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never >>> Active? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ---------------> it is >>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>> R2# >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 6 >>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 >>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active.? Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------>? hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> ? neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> ? neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> ? neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> ? neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ---------->? spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 -------->? Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> ? neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> ? no auto-summary >>>> ? no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never >>>> Active? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --------------->? it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 7 >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 >>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> >>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>> ? <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> Message-ID: >>> ? >>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>> >>> Hello Joe, >>> >>> I did the same as you did , but? when i read in 29.9 he said that do not >>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean >>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . >>> >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Elie Raad >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] >>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich >>> [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>> >>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>> per a specific router.. >>> >>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>> >>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>> >>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>> >>> Am I missing something here? >>> >>> V/R >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >>> *************************************** >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:17:56 +0100 > From: Tony Singh <[email protected]> > To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Thanks Jay useful, makes me think I should hold off.... > > BR > > Sent from my iPhone on 3 > > On 22 Apr 2012, at 19:58, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I googled it and found the link. It's from last Oct., but it was Marko. >> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2011/10/11/will-there-be-a-blueprint-change/ >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE >> >> >> >> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> To: Tony Singh <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 12:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >> >> I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy >> is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give >> "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime >>> soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training >>> materials and do not want to buy old gear. >>> >>> BR >>> >>> Tony >>> CCNP CCNA R&S >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> >>> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>> >>>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>>> 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>>> 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>>> 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>>> 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>>> 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>>> 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, ccie >>>> onlyone <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>> >>>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>>> >>>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>>> brevity. :: >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >>>>> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>>> >>>>> BUT >>>>> >>>>> This guy stays on the distro. I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >>>>> help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>>> from IPX. >>>>> >>>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>>> Sent from iJay >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> ccietocome >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 2 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>> per a specific router.. >>>> >>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>> >>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>> >>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 3 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hello,? >>>> >>>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im >>>> 21 and on a budget. >>>> >>>> Thanks.? >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 4 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 5 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>>> [email protected], [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>>> >>>> Hi Khaled, >>>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>>> respective loopbacks? >>>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> Sender: [email protected] >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 6 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:55:30 -0700 >>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>> To: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Can you ping from each source BGP Speaker interface to the relevant peer? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> On 04/21/2012 10:57 PM, khaled al-ajeman wrote: >>>>> Hi fellas, >>>>> >>>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>>> as a matter of fact it is still active. Below are my configuration >>>>> >>>>> R2 ------> hub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>>> >>>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R1# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5 --------> Spoke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>>> router bgp 1 >>>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> ! >>>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>>> no auto-summary >>>>> no synchronization >>>>> exit-address-family >>>>> R5# >>>>> >>>>> here is my output from R2: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never >>>>> Active ---------------> it is >>>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>>> State/PfxRcd >>>>> 200.0.0.1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> 200.0.0.5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 never Active >>>>> R2# >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 7 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:20:08 +0000 >>>> From: Elie Raad <[email protected]> >>>> To: Joe Danrich <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <3840b1aaec7edd4caff9def3ad0131b81b8d7...@amsprd0104mb146.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >>>> >>>> Hello Joe, >>>> >>>> I did the same as you did , but when i read in 29.9 he said that do not >>>> change next-hop addresses of receiving routes from R2 and R8. which mean >>>> that he want us to exchange routes coming from R2 and R8 . >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Elie Raad >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> [[email protected]] on behalf of Joe Danrich >>>> [[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 11:52 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> >>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>> per a specific router.. >>>> >>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>> >>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>> >>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >>>> *************************************** >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> >> > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 40 > *************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
