8x 2811 with adv services 3x 2600 with adv services 4x 3560 with adv services 1x 2600 base code Preferably a console switch (nm-16 can also serve in your frame-switch). About 16 Wan cards (WIC-2T) 8 port serial card
The below does not look to fit your needs for IPExpert. It will work for INE, most likely. Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from iJay On Apr 22, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > would like to gage opinion on the following hardware as I can get this for a > good price from someone local to me, does not include all the hardware I > believe, what is ipexpert workbooks hardware/software based on? > > The RACK > Item Description Qty > Cisco 1841 Advanced Integrated Services Router 256D/64F Security Feature > Set 1 > Cisco 2610XM 2610XM Multi-Protocol Multi-Function Router 128D/48F Memory > 12.4 IOS CME / SDM / Easy VPN Server / Firewall Feature Set / Security > Enhancements / IPV6 2 > Cisco 2610XM 2610XM Multi-Protocol Multi-Function Router 64D/32F Memory > 12.4 IOS CME / SDM / Easy VPN Server / Firewall Feature Set / Security > Enhancements / IPV6 4 > Cisco Advanced WAN Switch 3662 with MB-FE and Power Supply Frame/MPLS > Switching 1 > Cisco 2511 16 Port Terminal Server for Remote Console Access 1 > WS-C3550-24-EMI SMI with EMI Image - Layer 3 MLS 2 > WS-C2950-24 Enhanced 24 Port Ethernet Switch 4 > NM-4T 4 Port Serial Network Module - WAN Switch Serial Ports 3 > WIC-1T 1 Port Serial WAN Interface Card - 2Mbps 10 > WIC-T1-DSU T-1 Serial WAN Interface Card - 1.5Mbps 6 > Cisco 2610 Basic IP Router 1 Ethernet / 2 WIC Slot / 1 Network Module Slot > 6 > Study Guide / Labs CD Based Labs, CBTs, Tests, and Study Guides for the > CCNA / CCNP / CCIE 1 > Tech Tools 4 CD Set Simulators, Network Traffic Generators, Diagnostics, > Security Wizards 1 > Cable - Console Console Connector 1 > Cable - Cat5 Category 5 Ethernet Patch Cables Includes CrossOvers 20 > Cable - Serial Xover DCE / DTE Serial Crossover Cables - WAN Emulation > 10 > Cable - T1Crossover T-1 Serial Crossover Cables - WAN Emulation 3 > Network Rack 7 Foot Network Rack with Racking Accessories 1 > Cable - AsyncOctal 8 Port RJ45 Console/Async Octal Cable 2 > Cable - Power Power Cables 22 > > BR > > Tony > CCNP CCNA R&S > > Sent from my iPhone on 3 > > On 22 Apr 2012, at 20:18, [email protected] wrote: > >> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 (Jay McMickle) >> 2. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 (Tony Singh) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:58:22 -0700 (PDT) >> From: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >> To: Bob McCouch <[email protected]>, Tony Singh <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >> >> I googled it and found the link.? It's from last Oct., but it was Marko. >> http://blog.ipexpert.com/2011/10/11/will-there-be-a-blueprint-change/ >> ? >> >> >> Regards, >> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE >> >> ? >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> >> To: Tony Singh <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 12:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 75, Issue 36 >> >> I'm unaware of any announced changes to the exam, and Cisco's policy >> is that before a major change (like 4.0 to 5.0) they will give >> "plenty" of warning which is at least 6 months as far as I know. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> A speculative question but I need to know if v4 will become v5 anytime >>> soon, reason for asking is I'm planning on buying equipment and training >>> materials and do not want to buy old gear. >>> >>> BR >>> >>> Tony >>> CCNP CCNA R&S >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >>> >>> On 22 Apr 2012, at 08:20, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to >>>> ? [email protected] >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> ? http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> ? [email protected] >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> ? [email protected] >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." >>>> >>>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> ? 1. Re: CCIElab lab 5 (Marko Milivojevic) >>>> ? 2. Vol 1 - 29.6 (Joe Danrich) >>>> ? 3. CCIE level Labs (Breland Rogers) >>>> ? 4. VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (khaled al-ajeman) >>>> ? 5. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a ([email protected]) >>>> ? 6. Re: VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a (Joe Danrich) >>>> ? 7. Re: Vol 1 - 29.6 (Elie Raad) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:16:00 -0700 >>>> From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >>>> To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,? ? ccie >>>> ? onlyone <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIElab lab 5 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain;? ? charset=us-ascii >>>> >>>> Bloody bastard keeps changing email address. We've banned 7 last week. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 >>>> >>>> :: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and >>>> brevity. :: >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 8:53, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How is it that if I post something even with the slightest opinion, Marko >>>>> shuts it down, and offline emails me. >>>>> >>>>> BUT >>>>> >>>>> This guy stays on the distro.? I think Marko needs to pay closer watch an >>>>> help us filter these guys out. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and I expect this continue, even after Marko emails me a nasty note >>>>> from IPX. >>>>> >>>>> Happy labbing weekend, gents! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP >>>>> Sent from iJay >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2012, at 7:22 AM, ccie onlyone <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My friend got the new lab, just to get update, add me >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> ccietocome >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 2 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:52:47 -0700 >>>> From: Joe Danrich <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 1 - 29.6 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Okay so in this step it wants you to create two VRF's (VPNA & VPNB) one >>>> per a specific router.. >>>> >>>> It doesn't state anywhere that you are supposed to import each >>>> respective route-target into one another. A's rt into B and vice versa. >>>> >>>> However the results and described solution in the solutions guide, state >>>> that each router should import the others route-target? >>>> >>>> It's contradictory in my mind, that if a step doesn't tell you to do >>>> something, you shouldn't do it.. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something here? >>>> >>>> V/R >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 3 >>>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:16:53 -0700 (PDT) >>>> From: Breland Rogers <[email protected]> >>>> To: IPEXPERT <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE level Labs >>>> Message-ID: >>>> ? <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hello,? >>>> >>>> Could anyone please share any free GNS3 CCIE level labs that are free. ?Im >>>> 21 and on a budget. >>>> >>>> Thanks.? >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 4 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 +0300 >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> ? <CACv-o9uinWBPs9=s-kyf1qm5e2ekwrnhu6r7s8kq5+_zcgy...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active.? Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 -------->? Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never >>>> Active? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 5 >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:42:52 +0000 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: "khaled al-ajeman" <[email protected]>, >>>> ? [email protected], [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> Message-ID: >>>> ? >>>> <1993407919-1335076970-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-892677182-@b28.c9.bise7.blackberry> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" >>>> >>>> Hi Khaled, >>>> I am not familar with the topology but have u confirmed layer 3 >>>> reachability between ur spoke and hub? Sourcing ur icmp pings from your >>>> respective loopbacks? >>>> Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone provided by Airtel Nigeria. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: khaled al-ajeman <[email protected]> >>>> Sender: [email protected] >>>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:57:33 >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VOL. 1 LAB 14.1 a >>>> >>>> Hi fellas, >>>> >>>> I have done my bgp connection right, but still my bgp connection is not up >>>> as a matter of fact it is still active.? Below are my configuration >>>> >>>> R2 ------ > hub >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sr | s bgp >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor peergroup peer-group >>>> neighbor peergroup remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor peergroup update-source Loopback0 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 peer-group peergroup >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 peer-group peergroup >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor peergroup route-reflector-client >>>> neighbor peergroup next-hop-self >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.1 activate >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.5 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R2# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R1 ----------> spoke >>>> >>>> R1#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R1# >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R5 -------->? Spoke >>>> >>>> >>>> R5#sr | s bg >>>> router bgp 1 >>>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast >>>> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 remote-as 1 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 update-source Loopback0 >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> ! >>>> address-family ipv4 multicast >>>> neighbor 200.0.0.2 activate >>>> no auto-summary >>>> no synchronization >>>> exit-address-family >>>> R5# >>>> >>>> here is my output from R2: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 unicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never >>>> Active? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ---------------> it is >>>> suppose to be 0 for both routers R1 AND R5 >>>> 200.0.0.5? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? 0? ? 0 never? ? Active >>>> R2#sh ip bgp ipv4 multicast sum >>>> BGP router identifier 200.0.0.2, local AS number 1 >>>> BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 >>>> Neighbor? ? ? ? V? ? AS MsgRcvd MsgSent? TblVer? InQ OutQ Up/Down >>>> State/PfxRcd >>>> 200.0.0.1? ? ? 4? ? 1? ? ? 0? ? ? 0? ? ? ? 0? ? _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
