Stuart that is a good question. The problem is you are going to have to change the topology a bit any ways to get this to work with the changes. So loading the configuration by script isn't going to save much time. I wish I was further along in the development for you guys but this is just a suggestion to allow you guys to continue to study while I play catch up.
Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Cell: +1.248.504.7309 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] Join our free online support and peer group communities: <http://www.IPexpert.com/communities> http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. From: Stuart Hare [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:30 PM To: Tyson Scott Cc: Simon Baumann; OSL Security Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. Thanks Tyson a good insight into getting a little more life out the old WB. Is there a plan to adjust/apply the configs to the Load Configs applet in proctor labs or is the concentration fully on the new material? Stu On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote: Simon, Here is something similar to what we will do to update the labs. You can do something very similar to still study with the material. You will need to change around the layer 2 connectivity based on the new topology but I think most of the labs in the multiprotocol can be completed with the version 3.0 topology and the old material. Section 13 - Use R7 and R8 to Replace the PIX and VPN C. Any advanced filtering tasks do on ASA1 or ASA2. Do ZFW on the Router you use to replace PIX to add some work for yourself. Section 14 - Don't actually have the failover pair. Use ASA2 to replace the PIX. Use router to replace VPN Concentrator, R7 or R8. Section 15 - Don't do failover and replace pix with ASA. Replace VPNC with Router. Section 16 - Same as section 13. Tasks that you can't do on the router re-think it and do it somehow on the ASA's instead Section 17 - Test failover and then take one out of the failover pair and use it to replace the VPNC Section 18 - Don't have the failover pair and use the ASA to replace the PIX Section 19 - Replace PIX/VPNC with R7/R8 Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Cell: +1.248.504.7309 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Baumann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:09 AM To: Tyson Scott Subject: Re: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. Yep, I could reconfigure some labs. But not the 8h multiprotocol labs, since every lab is using the ASA. Is there any schedule for the 3.0 material? Regards Simon Am 08.05.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Tyson Scott: > If the lab is not using both asa's just use the asa's in place of > the PIX. > They perform the same functions. > > Regards, > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Cell: +1.248.504.7309 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video > On Demand > and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, > CCIE > Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE > Storage > Lab Certifications. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Down [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: 'Drew LePla' > Subject: FW: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. > > Tyson, > > Can you help out Simon here a little bit? Should he just totally > skip over > PIX since it's not on the lab? > > Best wishes, > > Mike Down > > Training Advisor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 x 206 > > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > Skype: mikedownipexpert > > -- > > Follow me on Twitter! > > Check out My Blog! > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Baumann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:24 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. > > > Hi Mike, > I'll try to describe my problem with the older WB, using the new v3.0 > pods. Drew told me, that all pods, except pod 123 and 124 (if I > remember correctly) > have no more PIX available. The PIX is used in every multiporotocol > lab and in many of the technology labs. So I got the WB, but I could > hardly use it with > the current pods. > > Cheers > Simon > > > -- Stuart Hare [email protected]
