No worries, just thought Id check before modifying the existing configs ;-) (Im more interested in any new content at this stage if Im honest)
Cheers Stu On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > Stuart that is a good question. The problem is you are going to have to > change the topology a bit any ways to get this to work with the changes. So > loading the configuration by script isn’t going to save much time. I wish I > was further along in the development for you guys but this is just a > suggestion to allow you guys to continue to study while I play catch up. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security > > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Cell: +1.248.504.7309 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > > > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> > > > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On > Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, > CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE > Storage Lab Certifications. > > > > *From:* Stuart Hare [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:30 PM > *To:* Tyson Scott > *Cc:* Simon Baumann; OSL Security > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 > ProctorLab pods. > > > > Thanks Tyson a good insight into getting a little more life out the old WB. > > Is there a plan to adjust/apply the configs to the Load Configs applet in > proctor labs or is the concentration fully on the new material? > > > > Stu > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Tyson Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Simon, > > Here is something similar to what we will do to update the labs. You can > do > something very similar to still study with the material. > > You will need to change around the layer 2 connectivity based on the new > topology but I think most of the labs in the multiprotocol can be completed > with the version 3.0 topology and the old material. > > Section 13 - Use R7 and R8 to Replace the PIX and VPN C. Any advanced > filtering tasks do on ASA1 or ASA2. Do ZFW on the Router you use to > replace > PIX to add some work for yourself. > Section 14 - Don't actually have the failover pair. Use ASA2 to replace > the > PIX. Use router to replace VPN Concentrator, R7 or R8. > Section 15 - Don't do failover and replace pix with ASA. Replace VPNC with > Router. > Section 16 - Same as section 13. Tasks that you can't do on the router > re-think it and do it somehow on the ASA's instead > Section 17 - Test failover and then take one out of the failover pair and > use it to replace the VPNC > Section 18 - Don't have the failover pair and use the ASA to replace the > PIX > Section 19 - Replace PIX/VPNC with R7/R8 > > > > > Regards, > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Cell: +1.248.504.7309 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On > Demand > and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE > Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage > Lab Certifications. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Baumann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:09 AM > To: Tyson Scott > Subject: Re: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. > > Yep, I could reconfigure some labs. But not the 8h multiprotocol labs, > since every lab is using the ASA. > Is there any schedule for the 3.0 material? > > Regards > Simon > > Am 08.05.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Tyson Scott: > > > If the lab is not using both asa's just use the asa's in place of > > the PIX. > > They perform the same functions. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security > > Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > > Cell: +1.248.504.7309 > > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > > Mailto: [email protected] > > > > Join our free online support and peer group communities: > > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities> > > > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video > > On Demand > > and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, > > CCIE > > Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE > > Storage > > Lab Certifications. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Down [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:26 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: 'Drew LePla' > > Subject: FW: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. > > > > Tyson, > > > > Can you help out Simon here a little bit? Should he just totally > > skip over > > PIX since it's not on the lab? > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Mike Down > > > > Training Advisor - IPexpert, Inc. > > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 x 206 > > > > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > > Mailto: [email protected] > > > > Skype: mikedownipexpert > > > > -- > > > > Follow me on Twitter! > > > > Check out My Blog! > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Baumann [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:24 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: CCIE Security WB v4.12 vs v3.0 ProctorLab pods. > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > I'll try to describe my problem with the older WB, using the new v3.0 > > pods. Drew told me, that all pods, except pod 123 and 124 (if I > > remember correctly) > > have no more PIX available. The PIX is used in every multiporotocol > > lab and in many of the technology labs. So I got the WB, but I could > > hardly use it with > > the current pods. > > > > Cheers > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Stuart Hare > > [email protected] > > -- Stuart Hare [email protected]
