My gut and my experience tells me that they wouldn't be cruel enough to expect you to know something didn't work in a certain IOS version and thus use version x from flash. Now if you didn't have a crypto set or something obvious, possibly. But that say fpm doesn't work as expected in
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send CCIE_Security mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_security > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Security digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: What if? (Tim Armstrong) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:41:37 -0600 > From: Tim Armstrong <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] What if? > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi All, > > I wonder if it would be fair game for multiple IOS/ASA minor versions of code > in the flash memory of the lab equipment and expect the candidate to pick > another one if necessary to complete the task at hand? In my past lab > attempts it never occurred to me to inspect the flash memory to see what > might be available. > > Regards, > Tim Armstrong > > P.S.: This is my first post to the list, so please pardon the formatting. > Is there a FAQ someplace that suggests how to politely respond to the list? > TA > > > > End of CCIE_Security Digest, Vol 43, Issue 80 > ********************************************* > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
