Yeah, when looking at WB2 labs I get a feeling that most tasks are stand-alone and independent of eachother. Of course there are exceptions and they can be pitfalls if not detected. But if the WB2-lab reflects the real lab my gut feeling is that at least 70% of the tasks are "stand-alone" and that you can leave it unfinished without challening more points that those on the task itself.
Do you all agree? Am I wrong? Reflections? /J 2010/4/22 Tolulope Ogunsina <[email protected]> > Hi, > Sounds like you've got a plan. > Its very essential to move on if you're stuck. The security lab is not > entirely dependent on each other so you can move on and come back to a > section. > I think its important to finish in time so you can have some time for > verification. This really helped me with my R&S. > > On 4/22/10, Jimmy Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > am thinking of time management. If I reserve the first 30 min for OEQ, > > another 30 min for me to read thru the entire lab and making > notes/diagrams > > while reading, and reserve the last hour for verification there are 6 > hours > > left for doing configuration. > > > > That means roughly 15 min per 4 points. (question: in ipexpert WB1/2, > most > > tasks are 4 points. Is it the same in the real lab)? > > Is this a realistic plan? I guess my goal then is to make all WB2 4 > points > > tasks under 15 minutes (yeah right, good luck to me!) ;) and also that I > > will drop a task unfinished if not done after lets say 20 minutes. > > > > Does this make sense? > > > > /J > > > > -- > > ------- > > Jimmy Larsson > > Ryavagen 173 > > s-26030 Vallakra > > Sweden > > http://blogg.kvistofta.nu > > ------- > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > > Tolulope. > -- ------- Jimmy Larsson Ryavagen 173 s-26030 Vallakra Sweden http://blogg.kvistofta.nu -------
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
