I had the same issue. You have to add an extra attribute on the acs  
related to the priv-lvl. I can't remember the exact command. That  
means you will have two attributes, the shell-cli-name: and the one I  
am telling you

Good luck

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:49 PM, ccie_security- 
[email protected] wrote:

> Send CCIE_Security mailing list submissions to
>    [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_security
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Security digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Role Based Access Control Questions (Tyson Scott)
>   2. Lab 1, Task 1.8 (Johan Bornman)
>   3. Re: Time management (Kingsley Charles)
>   4. Re: Time management (Ruwan Wickramanayake)
>   5. Re: Lab 1, Task 1.8 (Mohamed Gazzaz)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:04:13 -0400
> From: "Tyson Scott" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Role Based Access Control Questions
> To: "'Brian Almond'" <[email protected]>,
>    <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <003901cae25f$644a93a0$2cdfba...@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Brian,
>
>
>
> do show priv.  Depending on the version of code you may see >  
> instead of #
> even in privilege 15 in roles.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Mailto: [email protected]
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
>
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on  
> Demand,
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the  
> Cisco
> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia  
> and
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at  
> www.ipexpert.com
> <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  
> Brian Almond
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Role Based Access Control Questions
>
>
>
> I can't seem to get RBAC working with the ACS. I have tried the  
> example in
> Yusuf's lab with tacacs and the Lab 4 example with radius. I have  
> configured
> per the solution guides, but when I log in with the user from ACS I  
> don't
> get a view, I get user exec mode.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> -- 
> Brian Almond
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_security/attachments/20100422/df65af62/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:31:14 +0200
> From: "Johan Bornman" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab 1, Task 1.8
> To: <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am having difficulty finding a good cisco doc about object groups.  
> My
> question is about the acl. Is there any logic to the sequence/ 
> position of
> the object groups applied in the acl?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Johan
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_security/attachments/20100423/66a2fafa/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:24:26 +0530
> From: Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Time management
> To: Willians Barboza <[email protected]>
> Cc: OSL Security <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>    <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> My idea of the lab is as following:
>
> QEQ - 30 mins
> Lab - 8 hours
>
> When can we take the break and how many breaks can we take. Is the  
> break
> accounted in the 8 hours?
> Will we given separate time for reading the questions?
>
> With regards
> Kings
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Willians Barboza <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Just remember that unused time on OEQ can be used in the other part  
>> of
>> the lab... So, if you are sure of your questions, dont need to spend
>> the whole 30 minutes on it...
>>
>> 2010/4/22 Jimmy Larsson <[email protected]>:
>>> am thinking of time management. If I reserve the first 30 min for  
>>> OEQ,
>>> another 30 min for me to read thru the entire lab and making
>> notes/diagrams
>>> while reading, and reserve the last hour for verification there  
>>> are 6
>> hours
>>> left for doing configuration.
>>> That means roughly 15 min per 4 points. (question: in ipexpert  
>>> WB1/2,
>> most
>>> tasks are 4 points. Is it the same in the real lab)?
>>> Is this a realistic plan? I guess my goal then is to make all WB2 4
>> points
>>> tasks under 15 minutes (yeah right, good luck to me!) ;) and also  
>>> that I
>>> will drop a task unfinished if not done after lets say 20 minutes.
>>> Does this make sense?
>>> /J
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> Jimmy Larsson
>>> Ryavagen 173
>>> s-26030 Vallakra
>>> Sweden
>>> http://blogg.kvistofta.nu
>>> -------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
>>> please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Willians Barboza
>> CCIE Security # 25629
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
>> please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_security/attachments/20100423/eca4fd37/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:40:25 +0530
> From: Ruwan Wickramanayake <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Time management
> To: Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>
> Cc: OSL Security <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>    <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Kings,
>
> According to my experience at Dubai Lab center,
>
> OEQ:  7:30 - 8:00 (Max 30 Minutes, If you finish earlier, you can  
> move into
> the actual lab)
> Lab:    8:00 - 12:30
> Luch:  12:30 - 1:00
> Lab:    1:00 - 4:00
>
> So altogether, you will only get 8 hours for both OEQ and the Lab.
>
> You can take breaks (ex: to go to washroom etc) but still it accounted
> within your 8 hours. You won't be getting extra time for those  
> breaks and
> reading as well.
>
> HTH,
>
> Cheers,
> Ruwan.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Kingsley Charles <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> My idea of the lab is as following:
>>
>> QEQ - 30 mins
>> Lab - 8 hours
>>
>> When can we take the break and how many breaks can we take. Is the  
>> break
>> accounted in the 8 hours?
>> Will we given separate time for reading the questions?
>>
>> With regards
>> Kings
>>
>>  On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Willians Barboza <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Just remember that unused time on OEQ can be used in the other  
>>> part of
>>> the lab... So, if you are sure of your questions, dont need to spend
>>> the whole 30 minutes on it...
>>>
>>> 2010/4/22 Jimmy Larsson <[email protected]>:
>>>> am thinking of time management. If I reserve the first 30 min for  
>>>> OEQ,
>>>> another 30 min for me to read thru the entire lab and making
>>> notes/diagrams
>>>> while reading, and reserve the last hour for verification there  
>>>> are 6
>>> hours
>>>> left for doing configuration.
>>>> That means roughly 15 min per 4 points. (question: in ipexpert  
>>>> WB1/2,
>>> most
>>>> tasks are 4 points. Is it the same in the real lab)?
>>>> Is this a realistic plan? I guess my goal then is to make all WB2 4
>>> points
>>>> tasks under 15 minutes (yeah right, good luck to me!) ;) and also  
>>>> that I
>>>> will drop a task unfinished if not done after lets say 20 minutes.
>>>> Does this make sense?
>>>> /J
>>>> --
>>>> -------
>>>> Jimmy Larsson
>>>> Ryavagen 173
>>>> s-26030 Vallakra
>>>> Sweden
>>>> http://blogg.kvistofta.nu
>>>> -------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please
>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Willians Barboza
>>> CCIE Security # 25629
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
>>> please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
>> please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_security/attachments/20100423/f4e0992f/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:49:21 +0300
> From: Mohamed Gazzaz <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab 1, Task 1.8
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
>    <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
>
>
>
> Hi Johan,
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800d641d.shtml
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/traffic.html#wp1053224
>
>
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohamed Gazzaz
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:31:14 +0200
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Lab 1, Task 1.8
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having difficulty finding a good cisco doc about object groups.  
> My question is about the acl. Is there any logic to the sequence/ 
> position of the object groups applied in the acl?
>
> Thanks
>
> Johan
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_security/attachments/20100423/3663e60c/attachment.htm
>
> End of CCIE_Security Digest, Vol 46, Issue 117
> **********************************************
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to