Hi kings
 
yes you are right.By the way have you started studying for R/s track too? :)
 
This sounds more like an R/S question.

Thanks and regards

Yogesh Gawankar

--- On Mon, 8/23/10, Kingsley Charles <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Kingsley Charles <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Security] ip ospf network point-to-point under loopback 
interface with ospf
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, August 23, 2010, 7:22 PM


Hi all

Sinppet from 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a0080094704.shtml#qone


Why are loopbacks advertised as /32 host routes in OSPF?

A. Loopbacks are considered host routes in OSPF, and they are advertised as 
/32. For more information, refer to section 9.1 of RFC 2328 . In Cisco IOS 
Software Releases 11.3T and 12.0, if the ip ospf network point-to-point command 
is configured under loopbacks, OSPF advertises the loopback subnet as the 
actual subnet configured on loopbacks. ISDN dialer interface advertises /32 
subnet instead of its configured subnet mask. This is an expected behavior if 
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint is configured.


This statement is applicable only when the loopback address is not configured 
with subnet mask of 255.255.255.255, right?



With regards
Kings

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



      
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to