Thanks, Peter and Kings.

 

From: Pieter-Jan Nefkens [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 14 September 2010 08:47 AM
To: Johan Bornman
Cc: 'Kingsley Charles'; 'OSL Security'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Certificates

 

Hi Johan,

 

Can't say for sure for IOS routers, but I would assume that it is case
insensitive, as the same certificates are also used on the internet to
verify the dns hostname against the server name. And DNS is (fortunately)
case insensitive.

 

so my feeling is that it is case insensitve..

 

PJ

 

On 14 sep 2010, at 08:40, Johan Bornman wrote:





Hi,

 

Please see my e-mail below.

 

I am busy with a task (Task 4.2) where certificates are used for
authentication. I am trying to determine if the configuration required is
case sensitive or not. Does it matter? The DSG has both small-caps and caps
lock on. Is it a typo?

 

Thanks

 

Johan

 

From: Kingsley Charles [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 13 September 2010 08:45 AM
To: Johan Bornman
Cc: OSL Security
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] Certificates

 

I guess so.

With regards
Kings

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Johan Bornman <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

 

Is there a difference between:

     subject-name cn=R5.ipexpert, ou=CCIE, c=PL

     and

     subject-name cn=r5.ipexpert, ou=CCIE, c=PL

 

Is it case-sensitive?

 

Thanks

 

Johan

 


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

 

---

Nefkens Advies

Enk 26

4214 DD Vuren

The Netherlands

 

Tel: +31 183 634730

Fax: +31 183 690113

Cell: +31 654 323221

Email: [email protected]

Web: http://www.nefkensadvies.nl/


 Think before you print.

 





 

<<image001.gif>>

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to