I would avoid the ffff.ffff.ffff as that's broadcast. There are some other ones 
for CDP, multicast etc, but you can look those up. For the CCIE test I would 
just use the mac address auto unless otherwise told.

I don't have the lab book in front of me but based on the name of the interface 
I assume that the Inside and DMZ are on different VLANs so they are in 
different broadcast domains. The only time you would be technically required to 
assign a mac addresses is when you have multiple context Firewalls on the same 
broadcast domain in other words they share an interface. For example ContextA 
and ContextB both having an outside interface on the same 192.168.1.X network 
going to the same gateway.

Read this about classifier criteria, unique MAC Addresses:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html#wp1134027

Also try not to email me directly but cc the mailing list as we are all 
learning from each other.

-B


From: kamran shakil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 1:23 PM
To: Basem Hanna
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] [imp] ASA: mac-address auto "NOT ALLOWED"

well, i just wanted to clarify 2 things.

1> if mac-address auto is not to be used, then we can use command mac-address 
<aaaa.bbbb.cccc> right... well is there any logic to the command mac address or 
any number or alphabet (from a-f) can work...

2> my second query to my post is if anyone has access to Yusuf Config Labs 
cisco press book, in LAB 1 on Page 69 , you can see the MAC ADDRESS of INSIDE 
and DMZ2 interfaces are same ??? HOW is that ? can anyone see this and let me 
know is this an error or possible with some configuration !!!!

regards,


On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Basem Hanna 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Not sure what you're asking. You don't always have to use mac address auto. 
What problem are you having? what's not working? What did you try?


-B

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of kamran shakil
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 11:27 AM

To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] [imp] ASA: mac-address auto "NOT ALLOWED"

Guys,


This is F1 (Help call) . ...  ~ .anyone ...did u check this out...

i am doing most of the labs with mac-address auto , but seeing this lab i was 
stumped !!!!

plz do reply..

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:14 PM, kamran shakil 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
well, for yusuf lab i have quoted the page 69 see the outputs for inside and 
dmz2 mac address.


On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bruno 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
what makes you believe that they have the same mac? Is there any "show 
interface ethernetx/x" showing same mac?
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:18 AM, kamran shakil 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I was going thru Yusuf lab 1 and encountered something which made me write this 
email :


" If you see Yusuf book ( Ref: lab 1, page 69), Interface Dmz2 and inside 
interface have same mac-address. "

 How the pkts will be forwarded in this case? Isn't it strange ....   ( no 
mac-address auto) is defined already!

How does this work !!! no manual mac-address command was used for the solution.


regards,
Kamran.

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>



--
Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope)
Cisco Security Professional



_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to