hi Bassam, ack. you for inputs.

I know the 3 standard classification criteria , yet in Yousuf book, while i
was conducting labs on rental racks, i was astounded by the thing that
mac-address auto was not configured, and also manual mac- address was not
rpovided.....then how come in LAB 1 , i can see in the output shown on page
69 of LAB1 the same mac-address was present.

Anyways....thanks for patience and the url provided.

regards,
kamran.


On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Basem Hanna <[email protected]>wrote:

> I would avoid the ffff.ffff.ffff as that’s broadcast. There are some other
> ones for CDP, multicast etc, but you can look those up. For the CCIE test I
> would just use the mac address auto unless otherwise told.
>
>
>
> I don’t have the lab book in front of me but based on the name of the
> interface I assume that the Inside and DMZ are on different VLANs so they
> are in different broadcast domains. The only time you would be technically
> required to assign a mac addresses is when you have multiple context
> Firewalls on the same broadcast domain in other words they share an
> interface. For example ContextA and ContextB both having an outside
> interface on the same 192.168.1.X network going to the same gateway.
>
>
>
> Read this about classifier criteria, unique MAC Addresses:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html#wp1134027
>
>
>
> Also try not to email me directly but cc the mailing list as we are all
> learning from each other.
>
>
>
> -B
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* kamran shakil [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 04, 2011 1:23 PM
> *To:* Basem Hanna
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] [imp] ASA: mac-address auto "NOT
> ALLOWED"
>
>
>
> well, i just wanted to clarify 2 things.
>
> 1> if mac-address auto is not to be used, then we can use command
> mac-address <aaaa.bbbb.cccc> right... well is there any logic to the command
> mac address or any number or alphabet (from a-f) can work...
>
> 2> my second query to my post is if anyone has access to Yusuf Config Labs
> cisco press book, in LAB 1 on Page 69 , you can see the MAC ADDRESS of
> INSIDE and DMZ2 interfaces are same ??? HOW is that ? can anyone see this
> and let me know is this an error or possible with some configuration !!!!
>
> regards,
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Basem Hanna <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Not sure what you’re asking. You don’t always have to use mac address auto.
> What problem are you having? what’s not working? What did you try?
>
>
>
>
>
> -B
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *kamran shakil
> *Sent:* Friday, February 04, 2011 11:27 AM
>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] [imp] ASA: mac-address auto "NOT
> ALLOWED"
>
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
>
> This is F1 (Help call) . ...  ~ .anyone ...did u check this out...
>
> i am doing most of the labs with mac-address auto , but seeing this lab i
> was stumped !!!!
>
> plz do reply..
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:14 PM, kamran shakil <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> well, for yusuf lab i have quoted the page 69 see the outputs for inside
> and dmz2 mac address.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Bruno <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> what makes you believe that they have the same mac? Is there any "show
> interface ethernetx/x" showing same mac?
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:18 AM, kamran shakil <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> *I was going thru Yusuf lab 1 and encountered something which made me
> write this email :*
>
>
> " If you see Yusuf book ( Ref: lab 1, page 69), Interface Dmz2 and inside
> interface have same mac-address. "
>
>  How the pkts will be forwarded in this case? Isn't it strange ....   ( no
> mac-address auto) is defined already!
>
> How does this work !!! no manual mac-address command was used for the
> solution.
>
>
> regards,
> Kamran.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bruno Fagioli (by Jaunty Jackalope)
> Cisco Security Professional
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to