Thanks.

I will try and let you know.

But you see that it is working it is just the cosmetics of not seeing the 
correct stats on "ip nat translation"


Best Regards.
______________________
Adil 

On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Kingsley Charles wrote:

> Can you configure specific access-list for the route-maps as following and 
> try...
> 
> 
> access-list 102 permit ip host 10.55.55.55 192.168.65.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 103 permit ip host 10.55.55.55 192.168.35.0 0.0.0.255
> !
> route-map s2 permit 10
>  match ip address 103
>  set interface Serial0/2/0
> !
> route-map s1 permit 10
>  match ip address 102
>  set interface Serial0/1/0
> 
> With regards
> Kings
> 
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Adil Pasha <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Kingsley.
> 
> Here is the config:
> 
> 
> R5:
> !
> interface Loopback5
>  ip address 10.55.55.55 255.255.255.255
>  ip nat inside
>  ip virtual-reassembly
> !
> !
> interface Serial0/1/0
>  description IPEXPERT uses this interface for CENTRAL segment for YB Practice 
> Lab 1
>  ip address 192.168.65.5 255.255.255.0
>  ip nat outside
>  ip virtual-reassembly
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  frame-relay map ip 192.168.65.6 506 broadcast
>  no frame-relay inverse-arp
>  crypto map lmap
> !
> interface Serial0/2/0
>  description DTE side - Link to R3 DCE s0/2/0
>  ip address 192.168.35.5 255.255.255.0
>  ip nat outside
>  ip virtual-reassembly
>  encapsulation ppp
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  no fair-queue
>  crypto map lmap
> !
> ip nat inside source route-map s1 interface Serial0/1/0 overload
> ip nat inside source route-map s2 interface Serial0/2/0 overload
> !
> access-list 102 permit ip host 10.55.55.55 any
> !
> route-map s2 permit 10
>  match ip address 102
>  set interface Serial0/2/0
> !
> route-map s1 permit 10
>  match ip address 102
>  set interface Serial0/1/0
> !
> end
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards.
> ______________________
> Adil 
> 
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Kingsley Charles wrote:
> 
>> Configuration please.....
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Adil Pasha <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> This is about NAT question.
>> 
>> For some reason I am not seeing the correct NAT'd address when I PING from 
>> R3 to R5 even though the ICMP is being sent from 192.168.35.3 to R5 and R5 
>> replies with NAT'd address as you can see on R3' debug.
>> 
>> R3#
>> *Jun 22 16:25:48.462: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 192.168.65.5, dst 
>> 192.168.35.3
>> *Jun 22 16:25:48.462: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 192.168.65.5, dst 
>> 192.168.35.3
>> *Jun 22 16:25:48.466: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 192.168.65.5, dst 
>> 192.168.35.3
>> *Jun 22 16:25:48.470: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 192.168.65.5, dst 
>> 192.168.35.3
>> *Jun 22 16:25:48.474: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 192.168.65.5, dst 
>> 192.168.35.3
>> R3#
>> 
>> R5#
>> Jun 22 18:39:26.547: ICMP: echo reply sent, src 10.55.55.55, dst 192.168.35.3
>> Jun 22 18:39:26.551: ICMP: echo reply sent, src 10.55.55.55, dst 192.168.35.3
>> Jun 22 18:39:26.555: ICMP: echo reply sent, src 10.55.55.55, dst 192.168.35.3
>> Jun 22 18:39:26.559: ICMP: echo reply sent, src 10.55.55.55, dst 192.168.35.3
>> Jun 22 18:39:26.559: ICMP: echo reply sent, src 10.55.55.55, dst 192.168.35.3
>> R5#sh ip nat tran
>> 
>> When I check the NAT it is not 192.168..35.5. Could it be a bug or my error?
>> 
>> R5#sh ip nat translations
>> Pro Inside global      Inside local       Outside local      Outside global
>> icmp 192.168.65.5:3    10.55.55.55:3      192.168.35.3:3     192.168.35.3:3
>> R5#
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards.
>> ______________________
>> Adil
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to