Sorry to hear about this attempt Kevin, keep at it man! On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Kevin Damisch <kevin.dami...@vitalsite.com>wrote:
> OK, just throwing my 2 cents in on the v3 lab. I haven't got my score yet, > but I know I didn't make it. It was my first attempt and realized how > crucial time management and having a well-planned strategy is. It is > heartbreaking to have many sections working but you need just one more > bullet working to get points for that section and you end up with 0 on that > part. I tried to abide by the rule of not spending more than 15 minutes > troubleshooting something and I think that is what got me. It seemed like I > was hopping around from one thing to another and the end of the day came too > quickly. There were parts that were no brainers and other parts where I > changed one thing that broke other stuff I had previously configured. On a > positive note, I definitely know my strengths and weaknesses now! :) > > And, as it has been made very clear in this thread, do not ask for > specifics. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 9:13 PM > To: Jonathan Charles > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > > ahh I see thanks for clarification! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 2:12 PM > To: Aamir Panjwani > Cc: Brian Valentine; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > > Please do not assume you will get the same feedback... I got this > because I had a potential hardware fault and it turned out I caused > the problem. > > > Jonathan > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aamir > Panjwani<aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote: > > Jonathan, the most interesting bit of this entire thread is that Ben Ng > sent you an email with explanation of why you failed!! CCIE exam is > notorious for not telling you exactly where you lost points. So this must be > a massive help for you. By the way is that some kind of a new process that > every candidate will get detailed report of reasons for failure or are you > some sort of a VIP customer for them :) > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles > > Sent: Saturday, 1 August 2009 6:40 AM > > To: Brian Valentine > > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > > > > I know, in way too much detail, why I failed... I got an email from > > Ben Ng explaining it. > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Brian Valentine<bkvalent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I don't know what we expect Jonathan to tell us. What we really want to > ask > >> is something we don't really want to know and something he really can't > tell > >> us anyway because of NDA. > >> > >> Jonathan, bummer that you failed. It sounds like you know why you > failed -- > >> which is a very good thing. Better luck on your next attempt. > >> > >> I will add this. I took the R&S exam last year and passed on my first > >> attempt. I also thought the exam was a fair test of knowledge and > skill. > >> If you are well prepared in terms of understanding the technology > deeply, > >> have a plan of how to attack your lab, and follow your plan, you > certainly > >> CAN get 80 points in 8 hours. Now, I realize it is a different exam, > but I > >> would expect the voice exam to be similar in that it will be achievable. > >> Cisco doesn't want to know primarily that you can do stupid tricks with > >> routers and phones. Now I haven't sat the voice lab exam yet, but I > would > >> be extremely surprised and disappointed if there were 30 points of > stupid > >> phone tricks. Cisco wants to know that you understand the technology > deeply > >> enough that you can configure to a set of complex requirements. Bottom > line > >> -- they want to know that you are an expert. To an expert the exam > should > >> seem "easy". Of course, you could always have a tricky question or > two, > >> but remember that you don't need 100% to pass. > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Kevin > Damisch > >> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:17 PM > >> To: Jonathan Charles; Tanner Ezell > >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > >> > >> Thanks for that last bit of info. I will be sure to work on the > [deleted by > >> NDA] topics. Those are my weak areas. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Kevin > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > >> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan > >> Charles > >> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:05 PM > >> To: Tanner Ezell > >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thoughts on V3 > >> > >> Well, the [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] than I expected, but > >> [deleted by NDA] was [deleted by NDA] and [deleted by NDA] was also > >> [deleted by NDA] > >> > >> > >> Jonathan > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tanner Ezell<tanner.ez...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> So basically, you had thoughts, but can't share, and you did things, > but > >> you > >>> cannot tell us > >>> So all in all, <blank, details removed> > >>> :) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OK, I took it monday in San Jose and failed (got a nice email from Ben > >>>> Ng telling me why...) > >>>> > >>>> It was actually easier than I thought it was going to be... and > >>>> remarkably fair... > >>>> > >>>> I made a mistake that broke something and that is the primary reason I > >>>> didn't pass (no, I cannot tell you what the mistake was, or even what > >>>> was broken...). > >>>> > >>>> I will say the exam was not what I expected (nope, can't tell you what > >>>> I expected it to be...) > >>>> > >>>> I am retaking it 9/1 in RTP > >>>> > >>>> And for even less information, see http://www.cisco.com/go/ccie > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jonathan > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the > use > >> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > >> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure > >> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any > >> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly > >> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please > notify > >> Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all copies > and > >> the original document. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > >> visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use > of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all copies and > the original document. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com