You cannot delete the voice mail box and save the greeting. Messages
should be fine so long as the actual mailbox isn't deleted.

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mark Padilla <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to delete and create and or move a
> users VM Box with saving the users VM and Greeting. Please let me know if
> anyone has a better way of moving this information other than deleting and
> having the user recreate evertyhing.
>
>> From: [email protected]
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 58, Issue 32
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:00:03 -0500
>>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. CFUR and SRST - is there a bug? (Tam Nhu)
>> 2. Re: CFUR display For and By (Tam Nhu)
>> 3. UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (shafqut hamid)
>> 4. Re: UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (Prashant Patel)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:11:47 -0600
>> From: Tam Nhu <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR and SRST - is there a bug?
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Experts,
>>
>> Not sure if this subject has been posted before, but I could not find it
>> in
>> this forum. Here is the problem I just discovered a couple days back and
>> can be duplicated in many labs.
>>
>> I have configured CFUR to display the correct full E164 digits in FOR and
>> BY
>> field; everything configured on CUCM, not the router. But when I finished
>> my testing in SRST, and things are back to normal CUCM mode; I tested it
>> again by shutdown the serial interface again to force it go back to SRST
>> mode. Now, the FOR and BY field only display 4-digit, not full E164 as on
>> the first test.
>>
>> I rebooted the router and went to SRST mode again, then everything is
>> working with FOR and BY as expected. I then performed the same step above,
>> no shut to back to CUCM mode, then shut to go in SRST mode, now I
>> duplicated
>> the same issue with FOR and BY display only 4-digit.
>>
>> I duplicated this many times on my own lab and IPX vRack lab as well. It
>> does not matter the remote gateway is MGCP or H323 (I did test both with
>> the
>> same result). So looks like it is a bug to me and required to reboot the
>> router every time after it went to SRST. I didn't know about this issue
>> since we always have a fresh vRack session, and I only tested SRST once
>> time, but not 2nd time on the same vrack session.
>>
>> Has anyone run into this before, and what is the bug ID if you have it? Is
>> there another work-round to fix this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tam.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/d191a755/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:17:44 -0600
>> From: Tam Nhu <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display For and By
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi study2b,
>>
>> You can look at this thread and make it works.
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg19418.html
>>
>>
>> I've just posted a thread related to this issue, so if you make it works
>> and
>> run into the same problem, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> TN.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/b529c717/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:27:39 +0500
>> From: shafqut hamid <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX and CCM Integration Issue
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have installed CCM 7.0 and UCCX 7.0 with all necessary configuration in
>> VMWare but i am unable to test very first auto attendant script. Whenever
>> i
>> dial number for CTI route point i receive busy tone, although i can see
>> both
>> CTI Route Point and CTI ports registered on CCM. Also on UCCX Control
>> Center
>> operational state is "in-service". I already checked the Partitions and
>> Calling Search space which is "None" in both cases. Can someone let me
>> know
>> what could be possible reason and how can i investigate the issue?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Shamid
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/c2cfa981/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:33:51 -0500
>> From: Prashant Patel <[email protected]>
>> To: shafqut hamid <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX and CCM Integration Issue
>> Message-ID:
>> <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Shamid,
>>
>> I would suggest checking the codec you are using for the call. Also if you
>> are using the default icd script make sure you add a default csq and apply
>> it in the application.
>>
>> HTH
>> Prashant
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM, shafqut hamid
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have installed CCM 7.0 and UCCX 7.0 with all necessary configuration
>> > in
>> > VMWare but i am unable to test very first auto attendant script.
>> > Whenever i
>> > dial number for CTI route point i receive busy tone, although i can see
>> > both
>> > CTI Route Point and CTI ports registered on CCM. Also on UCCX Control
>> > Center
>> > operational state is "in-service". I already checked the Partitions and
>> > Calling Search space which is "None" in both cases. Can someone let me
>> > know
>> > what could be possible reason and how can i investigate the issue?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Shamid
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/c21a32ef/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCIE_Voice mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>
>>
>> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 58, Issue 32
>> ******************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to