Will Unity allow you to re add the mailbox, even if the account already resides on exchange? I thought you would get an error. > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:35:33 -0800 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Deleting and Creating VM Box on Unity 5.0 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > > You cannot delete the voice mail box and save the greeting. Messages > should be fine so long as the actual mailbox isn't deleted. > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mark Padilla <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to delete and create and or move a > > users VM Box with saving the users VM and Greeting. Please let me know if > > anyone has a better way of moving this information other than deleting and > > having the user recreate evertyhing. > > > >> From: [email protected] > >> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 58, Issue 32 > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:00:03 -0500 > >> > >> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > >> [email protected] > >> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at > >> [email protected] > >> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > >> > >> > >> Today's Topics: > >> > >> 1. CFUR and SRST - is there a bug? (Tam Nhu) > >> 2. Re: CFUR display For and By (Tam Nhu) > >> 3. UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (shafqut hamid) > >> 4. Re: UCCX and CCM Integration Issue (Prashant Patel) > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Message: 1 > >> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:11:47 -0600 > >> From: Tam Nhu <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR and SRST - is there a bug? > >> Message-ID: > >> <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> Hi Experts, > >> > >> Not sure if this subject has been posted before, but I could not find it > >> in > >> this forum. Here is the problem I just discovered a couple days back and > >> can be duplicated in many labs. > >> > >> I have configured CFUR to display the correct full E164 digits in FOR and > >> BY > >> field; everything configured on CUCM, not the router. But when I finished > >> my testing in SRST, and things are back to normal CUCM mode; I tested it > >> again by shutdown the serial interface again to force it go back to SRST > >> mode. Now, the FOR and BY field only display 4-digit, not full E164 as on > >> the first test. > >> > >> I rebooted the router and went to SRST mode again, then everything is > >> working with FOR and BY as expected. I then performed the same step above, > >> no shut to back to CUCM mode, then shut to go in SRST mode, now I > >> duplicated > >> the same issue with FOR and BY display only 4-digit. > >> > >> I duplicated this many times on my own lab and IPX vRack lab as well. It > >> does not matter the remote gateway is MGCP or H323 (I did test both with > >> the > >> same result). So looks like it is a bug to me and required to reboot the > >> router every time after it went to SRST. I didn't know about this issue > >> since we always have a fresh vRack session, and I only tested SRST once > >> time, but not 2nd time on the same vrack session. > >> > >> Has anyone run into this before, and what is the bug ID if you have it? Is > >> there another work-round to fix this? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tam. > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/d191a755/attachment-0001.html> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 2 > >> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:17:44 -0600 > >> From: Tam Nhu <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display For and By > >> Message-ID: > >> <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> Hi study2b, > >> > >> You can look at this thread and make it works. > >> > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg19418.html > >> > >> > >> I've just posted a thread related to this issue, so if you make it works > >> and > >> run into the same problem, please let me know. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> TN. > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/b529c717/attachment-0001.html> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 3 > >> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:27:39 +0500 > >> From: shafqut hamid <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX and CCM Integration Issue > >> Message-ID: > >> <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have installed CCM 7.0 and UCCX 7.0 with all necessary configuration in > >> VMWare but i am unable to test very first auto attendant script. Whenever > >> i > >> dial number for CTI route point i receive busy tone, although i can see > >> both > >> CTI Route Point and CTI ports registered on CCM. Also on UCCX Control > >> Center > >> operational state is "in-service". I already checked the Partitions and > >> Calling Search space which is "None" in both cases. Can someone let me > >> know > >> what could be possible reason and how can i investigate the issue? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Shamid > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/c2cfa981/attachment-0001.html> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 4 > >> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:33:51 -0500 > >> From: Prashant Patel <[email protected]> > >> To: shafqut hamid <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX and CCM Integration Issue > >> Message-ID: > >> <[email protected]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> > >> Hi Shamid, > >> > >> I would suggest checking the codec you are using for the call. Also if you > >> are using the default icd script make sure you add a default csq and apply > >> it in the application. > >> > >> HTH > >> Prashant > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM, shafqut hamid > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I have installed CCM 7.0 and UCCX 7.0 with all necessary configuration > >> > in > >> > VMWare but i am unable to test very first auto attendant script. > >> > Whenever i > >> > dial number for CTI route point i receive busy tone, although i can see > >> > both > >> > CTI Route Point and CTI ports registered on CCM. Also on UCCX Control > >> > Center > >> > operational state is "in-service". I already checked the Partitions and > >> > Calling Search space which is "None" in both cases. Can someone let me > >> > know > >> > what could be possible reason and how can i investigate the issue? > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Shamid > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > >> > please > >> > visit www.ipexpert.com > >> > > >> > > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101210/c21a32ef/attachment-0001.html> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CCIE_Voice mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > >> > >> > >> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 58, Issue 32 > >> ****************************************** > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
