Read the whole command: "show run-config commands".  I just tried it on a
7.0.116.0 WLC and it shows the output you were looking for:

(WLC-A) >show run-config commands
 802.11a 11nSupport a-msdu tx disable

 802.11a 11nSupport mcs tx 0 disable

 802.11a 11nSupport mcs tx 1 disable

 802.11a 11nSupport mcs tx 8 disable

 802.11a 11nSupport mcs tx 9 disable
------
The rest of the output is not shown.

Jason Boyers, CCIE #26024 (Wireless)
Blog: netboyers.wordpress.com


On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Kristján Ólafur Eðvarðsson <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Yes that doesn´t work anymore in 7 code. I am 7.0.220 atm, don´t know if
> it makes difference.****
>
> ** **
>
> Show run-config and show running-config gives me the same output.****
>
> It seems to me that more people are noticing it.****
>
> ** **
>
> show run-config****
>
> Press Enter to continue...****
>
> ** **
>
> System Inventory****
>
> NAME: "Chassis"    , DESCR: "4400 Series WLAN Controller:50 APs"****
>
> PID: AIR-WLC4402-50-K9,  VID: V02,  SN: xxxxxxxxxxxx****
>
> ** **
>
> Burned-in MAC Address............................ 00:21:55:07:B3:****
>
> ** **
>
> show running-config****
>
> (Sensa-4402) >show running-config ****
>
> ** **
>
> Notice: "show running-config" has been changed to be an alias to "show
> run-config".****
>
> Use "show run-config commands" to display the configuration commands.****
>
> Press Enter to continue or <Ctrl-Z> to abort...****
>
> ** **
>
> System Inventory****
>
> NAME: "Chassis"    , DESCR: "4400 Series WLAN Controller:50 APs"****
>
> PID: AIR-WLC4402-50-K9,  VID: V02,  SN: xxxxxxxxxxxx****
>
> ** **
>
> no interfaces and vlan configuration commands as in 4.2 code.****
>
> only when I TFTP upload the config and look at it from there.****
>
> ** **
>
> regards. Kristjan****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jason Boyers [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 8. júní 2012 11:58
> *To:* Kristján Ólafur Eðvarðsson
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] CCIE_Wireless Digest, Vol 38, Issue 4
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Have you tried the "show run-config commands" command for getting the
> interface config?  That may help you. ****
>
> Jason Boyers****
>
> On Jun 8, 2012 6:37 AM, "Kristján Ólafur Eðvarðsson" <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I am also in the process of re-evaluating my strategy since I have taken
> version 1 a couple of times
> and I am preparing for version 2.
>
> There are at least 2 things that I have to change as it seems to me.
> When configuring a lot of common interfaces/VLANs on the WLC´s I used to
> like the idea
> of creating the first set in GUI. Then take the show run copy/paste to
> notepad. Modify and
> paste to other WLCs.
>
> In version 7 however show-run doesn´t work as it used to. So it doesn´t
> show the config as it should be pasted in.
> The only way today (it seems to me at least) is to TFTP upload the config
> file and edit it from notepad. But
> that defeats the purpose of being faster :)
>
> So I am going to use CLI from the start to do as much as possible and
> notepad with the Controllers and of course with the autonomous.
> I onlny use the WEB gui on autonomous when there is something I don´t do
> that often like configuring specific QOS,TSPEC e.t.c
> then the autonomous might help you. Some people use the GUI in autonomous
> to create the VLANs to avoid typos in bridge groups, vlans e.t.c.
>
> another thing that I discovered was if you keep the interface names
> consistent in WLC. VLAN names and all names in lower cases when possible.
> According to requirements of course.
> When doing common configuration for many WLC´s from WCS. You may use the
> WCS template to tie WLANS to Interfaces which usually doesn´t work becusae
> the interfaces on each
> WLC is different and doesn´t get published in the WCS template
> configuration dialog. So by keeping the vlan names consistent in WLC´s it
> saves a lot of time instead of deploying
> a WLAN template that points to the managment interface of each WLC (that
> is usually the only common thing) and then go to each WLC and rectify the
> WLAN to the correct VLAN interface. That takes time
> and can´t be forgotten.
>
> Another good thing is the WISM´s are gone and replaced by 5508s. This
> probably means we are short of 2 controllers as each WISM has 2
> controllers. This can be confusing when the time is
> ticking and after a long lab you easily make mistakes :D so I guess it is
> a little simpler with regards of creating many VLANs and intefaces.
>
> my 5 cents.
>
> regards. Kristjan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: 7. júní 2012 16:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: CCIE_Wireless Digest, Vol 38, Issue 4
>
> Send CCIE_Wireless mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://onlinestudylist.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ccie_wireless
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of CCIE_Wireless digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Lab strategy thoughts? (Jeff Rensink)
>   2. Re: Lab strategy thoughts? (Blake Krone)
>   3. Re: Lab strategy thoughts? (Jason Boyers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:29:17 -0500
> From: Jeff Rensink <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Lab strategy thoughts?
> Message-ID:
>        <cag4_piu-tulfyx5d4wvovw5j0_z7-drwbv37wne23n9cycx...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I'm starting to think about lab strategy to help guide my hands-on
> practice.  I have a few thoughts as to order of operations and config
> methods. But I wanted to see what the group thought and what has worked
> well for them.
>
> In terms of an order of operations, what have you found to be useful?
>
> Obviously, to start things off you will want to read through the lab,
> write out your own diagrams and any other initial notes to help organize
> the information in a meaningful way.  I'm more looking to see which
> sections/technologies should be done first and which can wait until later.
>
> When it comes to picking your sections/tasks to work on, what has been
> your order of operations?
>
>
> Another area that I wonder about is what is the most efficient way to make
> your configurations.  On the WCS and autonomous APs, we have both CLI and
> GUIs.  We also have the WCS that can be used to configure WLCs and their
> associated APs.  What have you found to be the most efficient method to
> make your configurations?
>
>
> Jeff
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20120606/dba9bce8/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:07:38 -0500
> From: Blake Krone <[email protected]>
> To: Jeff Rensink <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Lab strategy thoughts?
> Message-ID:
>        <CAE8-+duKo2JwNw3xaA7=1bu-kc3pq-vo_weo-xfaxoz1i6b...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Jeff when I went through the lab I started off like you suggested reading
> the entire workbook and paraphrasing in my own way. I also circled things
> that required radios to be done or should be done together.
>
> WCS can be used to do similar tasks on the WLCs and I would suggest using
> that if you are comfortable with it. I also used the CLI heavily, most of
> my tasks were done in notepad and then copy/pasted over. Learn autonomous
> CLI inside and out, seen as the GUI is so slow you'll be wasting time for
> page loads.
>
> Without breaking NDA can't really offer much as to which sections/tasks to
> do first, but there will be a very obvious order that you should complete
> the lab in, or at least I thought there was.
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Rensink <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to think about lab strategy to help guide my hands-on
> > practice.  I have a few thoughts as to order of operations and config
> > methods. But I wanted to see what the group thought and what has
> > worked well for them.
> >
> > In terms of an order of operations, what have you found to be useful?
> >
> > Obviously, to start things off you will want to read through the lab,
> > write out your own diagrams and any other initial notes to help
> > organize the information in a meaningful way.  I'm more looking to see
> > which sections/technologies should be done first and which can wait
> until later.
> >
> > When it comes to picking your sections/tasks to work on, what has been
> > your order of operations?
> >
> >
> > Another area that I wonder about is what is the most efficient way to
> > make your configurations.  On the WCS and autonomous APs, we have both
> > CLI and GUIs.  We also have the WCS that can be used to configure WLCs
> > and their associated APs.  What have you found to be the most
> > efficient method to make your configurations?
> >
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20120606/d598d5af/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:33:28 -0400
> From: Jason Boyers <[email protected]>
> To: Jeff Rensink <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Lab strategy thoughts?
> Message-ID:
>        <calo5k2tiings37t1cnuc6w_3cebch4elrkayyjunudct9my...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> In general, here are my recommendations:
>
> 1) Quickly review the test doc and diagram while reading
>
> 2) Configure the switched network/routing/wired QoS/multicast section,
> since everything is dependent on that working properly.
>
> 3) Configure autonomous APs section.  You should finish these (#1-3) in
> about 3 hours.  In San Jose, that gets you to lunch.  Be sure to save
> configs regularly!  Then, I rebooted before going to lunch.
>
> 4) Do a minimal config of the WLCs.  Basically, items that are
> individually applicable to a controller (interfaces), items that are easy
> to copy and paste (mobility and rf group names), and anything that would
> require the WLCs to be rebooted (adding certs, SNMPv3, etc.)  Notepad is
> your friend, with copy and paste.  Be careful to change things as necessary
> for each WLC.
>
> 5) Import the WLCs into WCS.  Then configure WLCs using templates, but
> don't use WLC Config Groups - they take too much time for the test.  This
> would also include configuring the video and voice section.
>
> 6) Finish configuring WCS and add the MSE.
>
> 7) Configure clients for connectivity.
>
> 8) You should have 1-2 hours left at this point to validate the
> configurations.  Now, there should be some general validation going on
> throughout (can you ping??)  This is doing full validations.
>
> This was a successful process for me.  One key is to figure out how to do
> each part of the process the fastest for you.  I listed what worked for me.
>  Another is to have that time at the end.  You will misread and fat finger
> things.  You need time to review what you've configured.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Jason Boyers, CCIE #26024 (Wireless)
> Blog: netboyers.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Rensink <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to think about lab strategy to help guide my hands-on
> > practice.  I have a few thoughts as to order of operations and config
> > methods. But I wanted to see what the group thought and what has
> > worked well for them.
> >
> > In terms of an order of operations, what have you found to be useful?
> >
> > Obviously, to start things off you will want to read through the lab,
> > write out your own diagrams and any other initial notes to help
> > organize the information in a meaningful way.  I'm more looking to see
> > which sections/technologies should be done first and which can wait
> until later.
> >
> > When it comes to picking your sections/tasks to work on, what has been
> > your order of operations?
> >
> >
> > Another area that I wonder about is what is the most efficient way to
> > make your configurations.  On the WCS and autonomous APs, we have both
> > CLI and GUIs.  We also have the WCS that can be used to configure WLCs
> > and their associated APs.  What have you found to be the most
> > efficient method to make your configurations?
> >
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_wireless/attachments/20120606/218afb5d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCIE_Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://onlinestudylist.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ccie_wireless
>
>
> End of CCIE_Wireless Digest, Vol 38, Issue 4
> ********************************************
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com****
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to